Live data from Hacker News

Today's Large Language Models Are Essentially BS Machines

quandyfactory.com

1–10 of 50 posts

Re: Today's Large Language Models Are Essentially BS Machines

#5
post #3

To me, this is the quintessential risk: It's plausible enough it will fool somebody with authority to act, but lacking competency to understand the information is low grade. Boom! "oh man.. but the computer said it was ok"

100% going to happen in the near future if it hasn't already happened.

Re: Today's Large Language Models Are Essentially BS Machines

#6
post #3

To me, this is the quintessential risk: It's plausible enough it will fool somebody with authority to act, but lacking competency to understand the information is low grade. Boom! "oh man.. but the computer said it was ok"

We already barely question the BS spilled by politicians and corporations. Now they have a scapegoat that wont ever die.

Re: Today's Large Language Models Are Essentially BS Machines

#7
post #5
post #3

To me, this is the quintessential risk: It's plausible enough it will fool somebody with authority to act, but lacking competency to understand the information is low grade. Boom! "oh man.. but the computer said it was ok"

100% going to happen in the near future if it hasn't already happened.

Those attorneys who blindly used ChatGPT to generate a brief regarding MC99 liability (a field they had no experience in) are a good example, I think. Of course, in that case opposing counsel started looking at the cites and quickly had questions for them...

Re: Today's Large Language Models Are Essentially BS Machines

#9
I'm surprised it doesn't touch on "creativity" which is a form of BS. So is being able to summarize or extract books and papers.

Unless it's mechanical work, it requires some form of BS, and that's why we've traditionally been so much better at this than machines. We've never been able to create "BS machines" before, so this completely shifts the paradigm.

Post reply on HN