Reddit using developers to suppress r/UFOs and r/SuperStonk?

You seem appropriately skeptical for my purposes. Free answer time my man. What's your take on a major national lab investing big money into technology based on physics that is 100% wrong, according to what is publicly known? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.06133.pdf (please note equation 15).

Re: Reddit using developers to suppress r/UFOs and r/SuperStonk?

#6

Post by ftxbro » Thu, Sep 07, 2023, 5:00 PM UTC

erdos4d wrote: post #5

ftxbro wrote: post #3

imagine thinking there is alien technology on earth

You seem appropriately skeptical for my purposes. Free answer time my man. What's your take on a major national lab investing big money into technology based on physics that is 100% wrong, according to what is publicly known? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.06133.pdf (please note equation 15).

if i can't understand those equations then does it mean aliens are real

Re: Reddit using developers to suppress r/UFOs and r/SuperStonk?

#7

Post by krapp » Thu, Sep 07, 2023, 5:08 PM UTC

ftxbro wrote: post #3

imagine thinking there is alien technology on earth

That Grusch guy says there is, and he's as honest as the day is long, according to other people, none of whom are willing to present hard evidence to corroborate his claims. Scout's honor, though.

Re: Reddit using developers to suppress r/UFOs and r/SuperStonk?

#8

Post by erdos4d » Thu, Sep 07, 2023, 5:23 PM UTC

ftxbro wrote: post #6

erdos4d wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You seem appropriately skeptical for my purposes. Free answer time my man. What's your take on a major national lab investing big money into technology based on physics that is 100% wrong, according to what is publicly known? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.06133.pdf (please note equation 15).

if i can't understand those equations then does it mean aliens are real

It means the guys a Lawrence Livermore are investing a LOT of money into technology that is based on physics which directly contradicts Einstein's general relativity, the best tested theory humans have. In my academic experience, government funders are unbelievably risk-averse, and I bet the ones who run major DOE labs are too. They know that equation is actually right, or are extremely certain that this thing will work even without a perfect understanding of it, or they wouldn't invest the cash. More fun facts: that equation contains a term that Jack Sarfatti has introduced (check citation 29 and the first paragraph of page.3). Jack Sarfatti is a UFO researcher, he studies UFOs seriously and writes physics papers on how he thinks they work. So DOE is pumping serious money into tech based off actual UFO science, which contradicts Einstein. Does this mean aliens are real? No. It does looks very suspicious though.

Re: Reddit using developers to suppress r/UFOs and r/SuperStonk?

#9

Post by ftxbro » Thu, Sep 07, 2023, 5:29 PM UTC

erdos4d wrote: post #8

ftxbro wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

if i can't understand those equations then does it mean aliens are real

It means the guys a Lawrence Livermore are investing a LOT of money into technology that is based on physics which directly contradicts Einstein's general relativity, the best tested theory humans have. In my academic experience, government funders are unbelievably risk-averse, and I bet the ones who run major DOE labs are too. They know that equation is actually right, or are extremely certain that this thing will w…

i like me some conspiracy theories but this one is too much

Re: Reddit using developers to suppress r/UFOs and r/SuperStonk?

#10

Post by erdos4d » Thu, Sep 07, 2023, 5:34 PM UTC

ftxbro wrote: post #9

erdos4d wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It means the guys a Lawrence Livermore are investing a LOT of money into technology that is based on physics which directly contradicts Einstein's general relativity, the best tested theory humans have. In my academic experience, government funders are unbelievably risk-averse, and I bet the ones who run major DOE labs are too. They know that equation is actually right, or are extremely certain that this thing will w…

i like me some conspiracy theories but this one is too much

This isn't a theory: either that paper is right, or the US taxpayer is being defrauded by DOE to develop tech based off junk science. One of those things is actually true. Do you pay US taxes?