Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#2Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns".
Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#3Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
isn't almost everything on the internet written by machines nowadays?
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#4Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
Nobody gets hurt by a little departure from reality, generating hype with low quality images and articles.
It's just meant to be nothing but a campaign anyways.
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#5Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
isn't almost everything on the internet written by machines nowadays?
As a language model I can't help you with that.
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#6Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
I don't get that vibe from the article at all. And I deal with thousands of pages of AI content on a regular basis.
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#7Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
Was the article edited? I don't see that second quote anywhere. I sort of understand your objection to the first quote, but the original source phrases it basically the same way.
> Preliminary analyses, graphically represented, have unveiled the presence of Aluminum (Al), Sulphur (S), Calcium (Ca), Iron (Fe), Chromium (Cr), and Titanium (Ti) on the lunar surface. Further measurements have revealed the presence of manganese (Mn), silicon (Si), and oxygen (O).
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#8Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
Was the article edited? I don't see that second quote anywhere. I sort of understand your objection to the first quote, but the original source phrases it basically the same way. > Preliminary analyses, graphically represented, have unveiled the presence of Aluminum (Al), Sulphur (S), Calcium (Ca), Iron (Fe), Chromium (Cr), and Titanium (Ti) on the lunar surface. Further measurements have revealed the presence of man…
- "Was the article edited?"
Yes, that quote I flagged was immediately fixed. I guess the author is following this HN thread.
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#9Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
Turns out when people try to write press release copy when English isn't their first language it sounds kind of funny. I see this alot in my own line of work. Honestly they're just making their best emulation of the kind of stodgy copy we tend to write in better english that's honestly so samey you don't even need AI to make it, you can just use a cheapo markov chain generator. [1] I use this for my lorem ipsum personally, fun to watch bosses actually try to read it.
Re: Chandrayaan-3 confirms presence of sulfur and other elements on lunar South Pole
#10Was this written by a machine? It looks cogent, but its comprehension feels pretty off if you look closely. I.e. it refers to the bulk elements comprising lunar regolith – aluminum, oxygen, etc. – as "traces". Or that odd line about "faster than traditional sample returns". Or "The instrument’s success highlights Chandrayaan-3’s potential for unlocking lunar secrets through creative engineering." What??
> Was this written by a machine?
No, it was written by someone for whom English is not their first language.