Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
1–10 of 29 posts
Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#2Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#3I wonder why the developer picked the D language?
Maybe they like it? It's a perfectly reasonable systems language, even if it's not my personal favorite. It might be something questionable if they used Fortran or Algol-68, sure.
Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#4I wonder why the developer picked the D language?
Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#5Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#6I wonder why the developer picked the D language?
(Timestamp is 6:45:08)
Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#7I wonder why the developer picked the D language?
Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#8Then Unix was named as a reference to it.
And now Multiplix is named as a reference to Unix.
We've come full circle, just about.
Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#9Originally there was Multix. Then Unix was named as a reference to it. And now Multiplix is named as a reference to Unix. We've come full circle, just about.
Re: Multiplix, operating system kernel for RISC-V and AArch64 SBCs
#10I wonder why the developer picked the D language?
I wonder why that's something worth wondering about. Maybe they like it? It's a perfectly reasonable systems language, even if it's not my personal favorite. It might be something questionable if they used Fortran or Algol-68, sure.
Now, I know the answer as a former D acolyte - it's an interesting language with powerful abstractions, albeit hobbled in some ways - but most people don't, so I think it a reasonable question to ask.