Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Welcome to Wikifunctions

wikifunctions.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 179 posts

Re: Welcome to Wikifunctions

#5

Post by abathologist »

userbinator wrote: post #2

There is a link on the main page titled "Decolonizing Functions", which leads to... https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Abstract_... I'm not sure if that is satire, or for that matter this whole site.

That page seems totally reasonable and admirable to me. It’s literally just advocating for including the wide and varied history of algorithm development, in order to encourage readers from many different backgrounds to find ways to connect with the important topic.

Re: Welcome to Wikifunctions

#6

Post by 20after4 »

noaoh wrote: post #4

https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code is a similar website for people interested in this sort of thing

WikiFunctions, I believe, has a larger purpose in the context of Wikimedia wikis, and that is they are building a library of functions that can be called directly from wikitext and the code will be evaluated automatically when the page is rendered.

I think the idea is to provide an easy way to embed dynamic content into the text of a Wikipedia article. This should provide a nice compliment to the way WikiData is used to dynamically insert data into articles.

Note: I worked for the Wikimedia foundation in the past, however, I wasn't involved with WikiFunctions. I just have some vague memories of internal product planning discussions about the feature.

Re: Welcome to Wikifunctions

#7

Post by TekMol »

What are the holes in the namespace?

    https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z1 is about "Type: Object"
    https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z2 is about "Type: Persistent object"
    https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z10 404
    https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z100 404
    https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z500 is about "Error type: Unspecified error"
    https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z1000 404
    https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z10000 is about "Function: join strings"

Re: Welcome to Wikifunctions

#8

Post by js8 »

userbinator wrote: post #2

There is a link on the main page titled "Decolonizing Functions", which leads to... https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Abstract_... I'm not sure if that is satire, or for that matter this whole site.

Your outrage at this seems to be analogous to outrage of people who think that it is horrible that Unix has a "kill" operation. Basically, you don't understand that "decolonization" is a metaphor for a broader historical perspective, and instead you're trying to interpret it literally and in a bad faith.

Re: Welcome to Wikifunctions

#9

Post by LudwigNagasena »

abathologist wrote: post #5
userbinator wrote: post #2

There is a link on the main page titled "Decolonizing Functions", which leads to... https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Abstract_... I'm not sure if that is satire, or for that matter this whole site.

That page seems totally reasonable and admirable to me. It’s literally just advocating for including the wide and varied history of algorithm development, in order to encourage readers from many different backgrounds to find ways to connect with the important topic.

[flagged]

Re: Welcome to Wikifunctions

#10

Post by cypherpunks01 »

LudwigNagasena wrote: post #9
abathologist wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That page seems totally reasonable and admirable to me. It’s literally just advocating for including the wide and varied history of algorithm development, in order to encourage readers from many different backgrounds to find ways to connect with the important topic.

[flagged]

> I don’t think an encyclopaedia should cater to racist views of its readers over factual information

Uh, nobody thinks this. I'm sensing an straw man argument fast incoming..

> So it seems unreasonable to stretch the truth to diversify or narrow down the number of people you mention

It's entirely unclear where you see the truth being stretched? Factually recognizing important contributions by people from under-represented backgrounds is doing the exact opposite of narrowing the "number of people you mention". It's literally mentioning more people who contributed to a certain effort or field of study.

Post reply on HN