Awful Recruiters

#1

Post by gyardley » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:11 PM UTC

Awful Recruiters
awfulrecruiters.com

Re: Awful Recruiters

#2

Post by mzarate06 » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:39 PM UTC

Friendly suggestion ... alphabetize the lists.

Re: Awful Recruiters

#3

Post by tomg » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:39 PM UTC

What's the metric for "purely crap"?

Re: Awful Recruiters

#4

Post by larrik » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:41 PM UTC

Nice list. I was surprised how none of the ones who email me are on it, so I'm assuming recruiters are mostly by area.

One question, though: why are you archiving these in GMail instead of trashing them? If you trash them, you still have 30 days to correct your mistake, and no recruiter email is worthwhile after 30 days anyway.

Re: Awful Recruiters

#5

Post by chollida1 » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:44 PM UTC

> All third-party recruiters are awful and need to find a real profession.

Wow, I'm not the biggest recruiter fan but this makes the site pretty hard to take seriously.

Re: Awful Recruiters

#6

Post by kyt » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:45 PM UTC

You can add cybercoders to that list.

Re: Awful Recruiters

#7

Post by iamjustlooking » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:48 PM UTC

It would be great to see an example of the bad recruiter e-mails received from each domain. I think this would give the list some more authority.

Re: Awful Recruiters

#8

Post by samsoffes » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:52 PM UTC

chollida1 wrote: post #5

> All third-party recruiters are awful and need to find a real profession. Wow, I'm not the biggest recruiter fan but this makes the site pretty hard to take seriously.

Obviously I'm kidding.

Re: Awful Recruiters

#9

Post by samsoffes » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:52 PM UTC

tomg wrote: post #3

What's the metric for "purely crap"?

"Requirement: Java Engineer" when I don't know Java, etc.

Re: Awful Recruiters

#10

Post by [deleted] » Wed, Mar 07, 2012, 7:57 PM UTC

[deleted]