Live data from Hacker News

‘Gay furries’ group hacks agencies in US states attacking gender-affirming care

theguardian.com

1–10 of 97 posts

Re: ‘Gay furries’ group hacks agencies in US states attacking gender-affirming care

#2
> The data released by the group, which calls itself SiegedSec, includes South Carolina police files, a list of licensed therapists in Texas and contact details for court officials in Nebraska.

Meanwhile the supposedly targeted agencies deny they suffered a breach.

This strikes me as a group that is less capable than they want people to believe, but on the other hand knowing how well local and start government do at InfoSec I also have a hard time doubting it.

Re: ‘Gay furries’ group hacks agencies in US states attacking gender-affirming care

#6

The key distinction here is these laws limit gender affirming care for minors.

[flagged]

Have you ever had a conversation with a trans person? Quality of life for trans people that get the privilege of blockers is enormously higher than their counterparts. They've been in use for decades; it's not new.

I cannot imagine a greater horror then having gender dysphoria, knowing exactly what is wrong, and still being forced to go through the wrong puberty (which does inflict irreparable harm, for us) because some "concerned" parents want decades of medical history on blockers before they deign to allow you to receive medical care. I wonder how that medical history is supposed to be built if no one is allowed to take blockers?

I'm not even going to engage with your bad faith argument that trans kids are only in the last 2-3 years.

I'm not under any illusion a person with your opinions could ever be swayed, but hopefully other reasonable people will see this comment and not fall victim to your scare tactics.

Re: ‘Gay furries’ group hacks agencies in US states attacking gender-affirming care

#8

The key distinction here is these laws limit gender affirming care for minors.

[flagged]

Puberty blockers have been administered as a valid treatment for precocious puberty for many decades. All of the bans on them specifically still allow them to be used for this purpose, because they are indeed safe enough. It's just that people don't like the idea of children being transgender, probably because it reminds them that they could potentially have a gay or transgender child.

The Alan Turing lie is laughable, Lupron wasn't even invented until 20+ years after Alan Turing was given hormone injections. The falsehoods you're spouting have the hallmarks of coming from Twitter infographics meant to enrage you. Trans care has been made into a wedge issue by US politicians as a way of taking advantage of people's ignorance about the topic, and their knee-jerk dislike of gender non-conformity. An incredible amount of non-sense is being spread, the same as it was about gay people in the 70's and 80's.

> In fact, "trans kids" has never been a thing until about two or three years ago.

Another blatant lie, but it's a fun opportunity to talk about the first trans kid in the US, Agnes Torres. She started taking hormone therapy as a child in 1950. Nearly 80 years ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnes_Torres

Doctors declared her intersex and she was given a fast track to having her documents changed. She went on to marry and have a nice normal life, because people left her alone. Trans people today could have the same if not for the vicious ignorance propagated by political parties looking for fresh meat.

Re: ‘Gay furries’ group hacks agencies in US states attacking gender-affirming care

#9

The key distinction here is these laws limit gender affirming care for minors.

[flagged]

> This is not "care"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073269/ "These results align with past literature, suggesting that pubertal suppression for transgender adolescents who want this treatment is associated with favorable mental health outcomes" - that sure sounds like care to me

> Attacking and shaming concerned parents as being "transphobic" for questioning this practice is not a helpful solution. We don't have the long-term data to ensure this is safe for kids

There are plenty of parents who are concerned that vaccines cause autism and question that practice. That doesn't mean vaccinations are unsafe. We do have data and overwhelmingly shows that these kinds of treatment are safe and effectice https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-the-science-... https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/2022...

> In fact, "trans kids" has never been a thing until about two or three years ago.

This is like saying that gay kids didn't exist until the 80s

Re: ‘Gay furries’ group hacks agencies in US states attacking gender-affirming care

#10

> The data released by the group, which calls itself SiegedSec, includes South Carolina police files, a list of licensed therapists in Texas and contact details for court officials in Nebraska. Meanwhile the supposedly targeted agencies deny they suffered a breach. This strikes me as a group that is less capable than they want people to believe, but on the other hand knowing how well local and start government do at…

To be fair given past experience I would expect victims of a breach to deny that it happened
Post reply on HN