Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
1–10 of 181 posts
Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#2It's a real shame because the Mississippi mercury levels were finally down enough to eat fish.
Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#3Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#4Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#5Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#6Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#7Does this mean the whole easter seaboard, should consider bottled water instead of tap?
Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#8Surely, clean water—something we all need—should be an apolitical bipartisan issue, right? ...right?
Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#9It's high time for a big awareness campaign for things like this: cleaning up our water should be an immediately funded government project. Needs a interactive map with historical data, sort of like https://app.electricitymaps.com/map does for historic grid energy cleanliness. Surely, clean water—something we all need—should be an apolitical bipartisan issue, right? ...right?
Re: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’
#10It's high time for a big awareness campaign for things like this: cleaning up our water should be an immediately funded government project. Needs a interactive map with historical data, sort of like https://app.electricitymaps.com/map does for historic grid energy cleanliness. Surely, clean water—something we all need—should be an apolitical bipartisan issue, right? ...right?
Republicans will reject any funding methods that add to the national debt, or taxes businesses
Democrats will reject any funding methods the come with strings attached to reduce or pull funding from other programs, or that does not excessively and punitively tax business and "the rich"
So with such an impasse nothing will get done