Live data from Hacker News

Comparing Adobe Firefly, Dalle-2, and OpenJourney

blog.usmanity.com

1–10 of 139 posts

Re: Comparing Adobe Firefly, Dalle-2, and OpenJourney

#3
Midjurney is still so far ahead it's no competition. Did a lot of testing today and firefly generated so much errors with fingers and stuff, not seen that since the original stability release. Anyone know if the web firefly and the Photoshop version is the same model?

Re: Comparing Adobe Firefly, Dalle-2, and OpenJourney

#4
not sure this is a good comparison. midjourney likes much shorter prompts, and honestly they're all absolutely terrible for anything that isn't 'photo' based. E.g. ask it to generate a word bubble of the most common programming languages and it will fail every time, no matter what you try. I love it for photo stuff, but for photoshop you'd expect it to be able to do other things as well.

Re: Comparing Adobe Firefly, Dalle-2, and OpenJourney

#5
post #3

Midjurney is still so far ahead it's no competition. Did a lot of testing today and firefly generated so much errors with fingers and stuff, not seen that since the original stability release. Anyone know if the web firefly and the Photoshop version is the same model?

Not with typography though, haha. It can't spell. I had to draw the letters myself

Re: Comparing Adobe Firefly, Dalle-2, and OpenJourney

#10

Amazing how quickly Dalle-2 went from among the best image transformers to among the worst.

The stagnation has been very curious. They are part of a large & generally competent org, which otherwise has remained far ahead of the competition, like GPT-4. Except... for DALL-E 2, where it did not just stagnate for over a year (on top of its bizarre blindspots like garbage anime generation), but actually seemed to get worse. They have an experimental model of some sort that some people have access to, but even there, it's nothing to write home about compared to the best models like Parti or eDiff-I etc.
Post reply on HN