UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
1–10 of 37 posts
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#2> "We have 50 to 100-ish new reports each month," said Sean Kirkpatrick, director of Nasa's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).
> But he said the number of those sightings which are "possibly really anomalous" are 2% to 5% of the total database.
So... 1-2 per month that are even in the "possible" category, and given the anecdotes around lunch microwaves and "turns out it was a commercial aircraft" this is not going to be the all-revealing report some folks are looking for.
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#3> "We have 50 to 100-ish new reports each month," said Sean Kirkpatrick, director of Nasa's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). > But he said the number of those sightings which are "possibly really anomalous" are 2% to 5% of the total database. So... 1-2 per month that are even in the "possible" category, and given the anecdotes around lunch microwaves and "turns out it was a commercial aircraft" this is no…
Kirkpatrick's slide notes of those UAP's typical characteristics:
round, 1-4 meters diameter, white/silver/translucent, at 10K-30K feet altitude, up to Mach 2, no thermal exhaust
That is quite revealing in my book. Those are no conventionally powered "drones".
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#4I’m taking a different approach to disclosing UFOs
If they did come out and say “ yeah we’ve known for a while” you have to realize that the world economy would crash.
Eventually there would be Instant transportation for everyone and Free energy for everyone
That is why disclosure will never happen until the powers that be all die off or something unimaginable happens.
My two cents.
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#5So there are sizable objects in Earth's atmosphere that do not belong to any known actor and display superior technological capability.
DoD, NASA & Co react with pointedly blasé attitude, pretending there was nothing remarkable about that.
Does HN buy into that?
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#6I’m taking a different approach to disclosing UFOs If they did come out and say “ yeah we’ve known for a while” you have to realize that the world economy would crash. Eventually there would be Instant transportation for everyone and Free energy for everyone That is why disclosure will never happen until the powers that be all die off or something unimaginable happens. My two cents.
[dead]
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#7I dislike that the article is filled with the false positive (FP) anecdotes. It’s important to state that there are many false positives, there must be. However, the focus should be on minimizing these FPs while maximizing true signal, and investigating these in depth. Everything that is potentially true signal, is what I want to read about, not something something microwaves during lunchtime.
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#8I’m taking a different approach to disclosing UFOs If they did come out and say “ yeah we’ve known for a while” you have to realize that the world economy would crash. Eventually there would be Instant transportation for everyone and Free energy for everyone That is why disclosure will never happen until the powers that be all die off or something unimaginable happens. My two cents.
[flagged]
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#9> "We have 50 to 100-ish new reports each month," said Sean Kirkpatrick, director of Nasa's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). > But he said the number of those sightings which are "possibly really anomalous" are 2% to 5% of the total database. So... 1-2 per month that are even in the "possible" category, and given the anecdotes around lunch microwaves and "turns out it was a commercial aircraft" this is no…
Kirkpatrick's slide notes of those UAP's typical characteristics: round , 1-4 meters diameter, white/silver/translucent, at 10K-30K feet altitude, up to Mach 2 , no thermal exhaust That is quite revealing in my book. Those are no conventionally powered "drones".
That's reported, not verified. It would say "tentacled oblong rectangle" if that's what got submitted.
Re: UFOs: What we learned from NASA's public meeting
#10I’m taking a different approach to disclosing UFOs If they did come out and say “ yeah we’ve known for a while” you have to realize that the world economy would crash. Eventually there would be Instant transportation for everyone and Free energy for everyone That is why disclosure will never happen until the powers that be all die off or something unimaginable happens. My two cents.
[flagged]
Why can't it be that all self reported close encounters are "crazy"?