WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
web3isgoinggreat.com
WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#2Simple pump and dump --- crypto bros must be slow learners.
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#3Simple pump and dump --- crypto bros must be slow learners.
WSB is the Reddit community where everyone openly admits to running with pump-and-dump schemes, with the hopes to not be the dumb bagholder at the end.
Its a legally grey zone IMO. Its not a traditional pump-and-dump scheme, but the effects are basically the same.
They choose a stock, somewhat at random to pump. They use WSB to communicate and coordinate when the pump occurs. The idea is to use a stock that has nostalgic value (Gamestop, AMC, BBBY), but is in dire straights.
A shorter term, tactical goal, is to often find highly shorted stocks and/or stocks with high options leverage to cause either a short-squeeze or gamma-squeeze event.
Its all public knowledge, legally and morally grey IMO. I wouldn't touch it personally, but obviously you get a whole bunch of pump-and-dumpers together in one location on the internet, they're all going to be competing for the same money on the same forum.
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#4Simple pump and dump --- crypto bros must be slow learners.
WSB is the Reddit community where everyone openly admits to running with pump-and-dump schemes, with the hopes to not be the dumb bagholder at the end. Its a legally grey zone IMO. Its not a traditional pump-and-dump scheme, but the effects are basically the same. They choose a stock, somewhat at random to pump. They use WSB to communicate and coordinate when the pump occurs. The idea is to use a stock that has nosta…
It certainly has that reputation but it is largely unearned in my experience.
There is no explicit coordination happening to create pump and dumps. There has, on occasion, been some level of coordination when attempting to trigger a short squeeze but that is mechanically different than a pump and dump.
What it does do, though, is spur memetic investment, which can create a short term frenzy for some stocks but it is not a planned event. Thousands of people post stocks each day and every so often a stock will perform well enough to where the community will take hold of it and push it to pretty incredible heights. The most recent one would be TRKA. If you're switched on enough, you can make some pretty massive gains.
However don't take this as me defending their crypto scam. That's just downright not okay.
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#5I cant wait to the part of the memecoin cycle where the yield farms pop up again
community provided liquidity thats is then locked? kind of perfect imo
there’s no reason anymore that a $600,000 sale tanks $50m asset by 90%, just a bad system design where there is no liquidity incentive
why even give nocoiners cannon fodder? just do the thing that already distributes the load well enough and fits the risk profile of enough people
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
WSB is the Reddit community where everyone openly admits to running with pump-and-dump schemes, with the hopes to not be the dumb bagholder at the end. Its a legally grey zone IMO. Its not a traditional pump-and-dump scheme, but the effects are basically the same. They choose a stock, somewhat at random to pump. They use WSB to communicate and coordinate when the pump occurs. The idea is to use a stock that has nosta…
It certainly has that reputation but it is largely unearned in my experience. There is no explicit coordination happening to create pump and dumps. There has, on occasion, been some level of coordination when attempting to trigger a short squeeze but that is mechanically different than a pump and dump. What it does do, though, is spur memetic investment, which can create a short term frenzy for some stocks but it is…
> What it does do, though, is spur memetic investment, which can create a short term frenzy for some stocks but it is not a planned event
Erm... investing in a security, then trying to create a meme is a pump-and-dump scheme by any other name. You've just changed the name "pump" to "meme", rather than using old-school behaviors like boiler rooms.
Its even "meming" the same information: too the moon, or whatever. In the 90s, it was all cold calls over telephone, but today you can use online forums to do this.
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
It certainly has that reputation but it is largely unearned in my experience. There is no explicit coordination happening to create pump and dumps. There has, on occasion, been some level of coordination when attempting to trigger a short squeeze but that is mechanically different than a pump and dump. What it does do, though, is spur memetic investment, which can create a short term frenzy for some stocks but it is…
> What it does do, though, is spur memetic investment, which can create a short term frenzy for some stocks but it is not a planned event Erm... investing in a security, then trying to create a meme is a pump-and-dump scheme by any other name. You've just changed the name "pump" to "meme", rather than using old-school behaviors like boiler rooms. Its even "meming" the same information: too the moon, or whatever. In t…
I'd argue that is a very simplistic way of looking at it.
There is always a narrative as to why a stock will go "to the moon". You say it's explicitly a pump and dump and it's not really, no. Look at GME, the idea was to restrict the float so that when the shorts got exercised, they would be trying to buy shares that didn't exist, creating exponential demand which would increase the price significantly. Not an impossible feat[0].
The "memetic" part of it is purely information exchange. That's all. If that's the barrier for entry for being considered a pump and dump, then I'd say anything which reports on a companys action could be a pump and dump. From Financial Times, to Bloomberg, to Mad Money, to StockTwits, to whomever else.
0: https://internationalbanker.com/history-of-financial-crises/...
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What it does do, though, is spur memetic investment, which can create a short term frenzy for some stocks but it is not a planned event Erm... investing in a security, then trying to create a meme is a pump-and-dump scheme by any other name. You've just changed the name "pump" to "meme", rather than using old-school behaviors like boiler rooms. Its even "meming" the same information: too the moon, or whatever. In t…
I'd argue that is a very simplistic way of looking at it. There is always a narrative as to why a stock will go "to the moon". You say it's explicitly a pump and dump and it's not really, no. Look at GME, the idea was to restrict the float so that when the shorts got exercised, they would be trying to buy shares that didn't exist, creating exponential demand which would increase the price significantly. Not an imposs…
In what way is this different than a pump and dump? You tout the stock and say it's going to 5x, 10x, whatever because of X. Then the suckers buy. Then you sell.
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd argue that is a very simplistic way of looking at it. There is always a narrative as to why a stock will go "to the moon". You say it's explicitly a pump and dump and it's not really, no. Look at GME, the idea was to restrict the float so that when the shorts got exercised, they would be trying to buy shares that didn't exist, creating exponential demand which would increase the price significantly. Not an imposs…
In what way is this different than a pump and dump? You tout the stock and say it's going to 5x, 10x, whatever because of X. Then the suckers buy. Then you sell.
Well, it's different because of whatever X is. X is the reason why the idea can spread through the community. It needs to make sense on some fundamental level in order to get past the onslaught of ridicule that every stock and member is subjected to.
If you say "ABC is going to increase 10x because it has a funny name" that obviously won't fly, but if you give a detailed account of why it is possible (this is called DD - due diligence), this has much more potential to excite people. I wouldn't classify open source intelligence as a pump and dump.
Re: WallStreetBets coin tanks 90% after insider dumps holding
#10[flagged]