AI is just someone else's intelligence
zdziarski.com
AI is just someone else's intelligence
1–10 of 170 posts
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#2I’ve taken to reading it as “augmented intelligence”. As in: take the intelligence of all the people who made the training data. Augment that with the intelligence of the people who devised the model architecture and trained it. Augment that with any emergent intelligence in the system. Augment that with the prompt engineers intelligence. Augment that with the end users intelligence.
Bada bing bada boom, AI.
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#3You down with OPP? (other people's perception)
Yeah, you know me!
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#4I’ve taken to reading it as “augmented intelligence”. As in: take the intelligence of all the people who made the training data. Augment that with the intelligence of the people who devised the model architecture and trained it. Augment that with any emergent intelligence in the system. Augment that with the prompt engineers intelligence. Augment that with the end users intelligence. Bada bing bada boom, AI.
There's no emergent intelligence in word statistics.
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#5Everything is a remix (watch the movie)
We are all using the intelligent of previous people, generations of humans. The same is true for AI.
It’s not different from humans.
What will we do once it’s conscient? Will AI have rights? Should we be able to shut it down?
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#6I’ve taken to reading it as “augmented intelligence”. As in: take the intelligence of all the people who made the training data. Augment that with the intelligence of the people who devised the model architecture and trained it. Augment that with any emergent intelligence in the system. Augment that with the prompt engineers intelligence. Augment that with the end users intelligence. Bada bing bada boom, AI.
There's no emergent intelligence in word statistics.
Does a book communicate intelligence?
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#7I’ve taken to reading it as “augmented intelligence”. As in: take the intelligence of all the people who made the training data. Augment that with the intelligence of the people who devised the model architecture and trained it. Augment that with any emergent intelligence in the system. Augment that with the prompt engineers intelligence. Augment that with the end users intelligence. Bada bing bada boom, AI.
[deleted]
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#8Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#9The problem with this reasoning is it could apply to any person who learns from culture as well. It isn't a problem however, it's only problematic inside the system of copyright, patents, equity, dividends, etc. If we viewed collective knowledge as a common good AI could be seen as contributing to total human flourishing the same as a public intellectual does.
Re: AI is just someone else's intelligence
#10Everything is a remix (watch the movie) We are all using the intelligent of previous people, generations of humans. The same is true for AI. It’s not different from humans. What will we do once it’s conscient? Will AI have rights? Should we be able to shut it down?
[deleted]