Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
1–10 of 16 posts
Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#2Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#3This is corporate overreach. They're suing a little guy to set a precedent. But this is the first time that I recall in the tech world a trademark holder is trying to extend their reach to a common nickname. JS could stand for many things.
Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#4This is corporate overreach. They're suing a little guy to set a precedent. But this is the first time that I recall in the tech world a trademark holder is trying to extend their reach to a common nickname. JS could stand for many things.
Disclaimer: I hate Oracle
Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#5Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#6EDIT: Apparently it's a legit trademark (I searched for it and it's active). Here's a recent post about it from Ryan Dahl: https://tinyclouds.org/trademark
Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#7Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#8Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#9This is corporate overreach. They're suing a little guy to set a precedent. But this is the first time that I recall in the tech world a trademark holder is trying to extend their reach to a common nickname. JS could stand for many things.
The full name of the company seems to be “Rust for Javascript Developers Ltd” Disclaimer: I hate Oracle
Re: Oracle sends legal notice to rename company over 'JavaScript' trademark
#10Is this parody? Surely Oracle cannot start enforcing its trademark after 20 years of ignoring it. EDIT: Apparently it's a legit trademark (I searched for it and it's active). Here's a recent post about it from Ryan Dahl: https://tinyclouds.org/trademark
Also as someone pointed out on Twitter it's probably not even in the right category to protect against the use in educational material. Also even if it were it's probably nominative fair use anyways.