Retiring a favourite C++ joke
ignition-training.com
Retiring a favourite C++ joke
1–10 of 151 posts
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#2There's dozens of people who would get it... DOZENS!
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#3We are all getting old. College age kids aren't old enough to remember when that show was on the air.
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#4I've read it "Rewriting ..." . You guess in what exactly.
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#5It's an OK C++ joke, but not great. I could certainly give the author a few pointers...
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#6It's one joke Martin. What could it cost, ten dollars?
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#7We are all getting old. College age kids aren't old enough to remember when that show was on the air.
[deleted]
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#8It's an OK C++ joke, but not great. I could certainly give the author a few pointers...
And I could add a couple of references.
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#9We are all getting old. College age kids aren't old enough to remember when that show was on the air.
I am also 29 and I'm old enough to remember Dawson's Creek, but I don't watch a lot of TV so I've never seen it.
Re: Retiring a favourite C++ joke
#10It's recommended to use virtual destructors for objects that live on the heap. Say you have a base class pointer to an object of a derived class; with nonvirtual destructors the base class determines the destructor that is called, whereas with virtual destructors it's the derived class that chooses the form of the destructor.