Live data from Hacker News

The American Diet Has a Sandwich Problem

wsj.com

1–10 of 129 posts

Re: The American Diet Has a Sandwich Problem

#5
> Twenty years later, a turkey sandwich contained about 820 calories.

Not sure where they got those numbers from. Just for comparison - in England, where many people eat sandwiches every day, the range is more like 300-500 for a supermarket sandwich. The meat is processed, but chicken is a fairly popular option, and the bread is thinner and less sweet.

Really the main takeaway is to reduce your bread. Carbs are terrible for diets, don't satiate you and most people eat too many. I treat baguettes and large subs as a treat the same way I'd treat a large slice of chocolate cake or ice cream - the bread part of a large sub can be as much as 500 calories by itself. As I got older I usually eat Warburtons 'Danish' bread which is 62 calories a slice, or buy a wrap or something. You could even skip the bread and just eat it with some veg as a salad. It will be just as satiating. And use half-fat mayo if you don't mind the taste.

Re: The American Diet Has a Sandwich Problem

#7
> Since a soggy PB&J is unappealing, Dr. Roberto says it’s pretty easy to rein in the amount of sweet jam. “There’s a built-in mechanism against overjellying,” she says. “It’s a really nice type of sandwich.”

The trick is to put peanut butter on both pieces of bread so it can't absorb the jam. Then you can put as much as you like :-).

Re: The American Diet Has a Sandwich Problem

#9
When I roast a chicken I save the breast for sandwiches, but there's a reason people don't make their sandwiches that way: processed meats are much cheaper. You might as well write an article that the American sandwich has a cost problem.

Face it: the sandwich is a luxury food. Healthier things are often cheaper, too. The vegetable street taco at my nearest taco truck is almost a complete diet by itself, and it's the cheapest thing on the menu.

Post reply on HN