Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
image-ppubs.uspto.gov
Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
1–10 of 93 posts
Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#2Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#3Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#4Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#5One more disgusting show of corporations doing the wrong thing in the name of profits.
This is assuming there are the appropriate regulations in place to notify and give a reasonable option to rectify the payment issue, but isn’t this exactly how we deal with stuff from homes to furniture? You agree to pay a certain amount and if you are sufficiently delinquent, you lose access to that item because you don’t actually own it yet.
Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#6Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#7you vill own nothing...
Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#8One more disgusting show of corporations doing the wrong thing in the name of profits.
Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#9One more disgusting show of corporations doing the wrong thing in the name of profits.
I know this is going to be an unpopular take, but why should a person be allowed to maintain use of an item they don’t own and are delinquent on? The unpopular part is that this just removes some friction from an already existing process. This is assuming there are the appropriate regulations in place to notify and give a reasonable option to rectify the payment issue, but isn’t this exactly how we deal with stuff fr…
Re: Ford's new patent proposes a way for banks to disable features on leased cars
#10One more disgusting show of corporations doing the wrong thing in the name of profits.
I know this is going to be an unpopular take, but why should a person be allowed to maintain use of an item they don’t own and are delinquent on? The unpopular part is that this just removes some friction from an already existing process. This is assuming there are the appropriate regulations in place to notify and give a reasonable option to rectify the payment issue, but isn’t this exactly how we deal with stuff fr…