Live data from Hacker News

Why 536 was 'the worst year to be alive' (2018)

science.org

1–10 of 115 posts

Re: Why 536 was 'the worst year to be alive' (2018)

#2
Related:

Volcanoes, plague, famine and endless winter: Welcome to 536 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30621640 - March 2022 (39 comments)

Skies went dark: Historians pinpoint the 'worst year' ever to be alive - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26786838 - April 2021 (117 comments)

536 was ‘the worst year to be alive’ (2018) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23565762 - June 2020 (356 comments)

Why 536 was ‘the worst year to be alive’ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18469891 - Nov 2018 (4 comments)

Others?

Re: Why 536 was 'the worst year to be alive' (2018)

#6
post #4

And nothing prevents new volcanic explosions from doing this again. How would the northern world deal with this today? Not that well.

Greenhouses and vertical farms would make the famine less severe; although our population is so high that it would get complicated fast

Re: Why 536 was 'the worst year to be alive' (2018)

#8
post #4

And nothing prevents new volcanic explosions from doing this again. How would the northern world deal with this today? Not that well.

Greenhouses and vertical farms would make the famine less severe; although our population is so high that it would get complicated fast

How many of these vertical farms do we have? How long do they take to build? What do they cost to run?

Re: Why 536 was 'the worst year to be alive' (2018)

#9
post #4

And nothing prevents new volcanic explosions from doing this again. How would the northern world deal with this today? Not that well.

Greenhouses and vertical farms would make the famine less severe; although our population is so high that it would get complicated fast

The big backup is diverting certain animal feeds to instead feed people.

Re: Why 536 was 'the worst year to be alive' (2018)

#10
post #7

How interesting that a bunch of tech nutcases now want to geoengineer the planet by dispersing sulphur into the stratosphere to dim the sun to 'tackle' climate change. Mind-blowing stupidity.

Because gradually injecting sulfur is the same as massive uncontrolled natural injections, right?
Post reply on HN