Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

I agree, it'll probably be scrubbed from the frontpage shortly. It's sad that this is the case, especially since it's published in a scientific journal.

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#8

Post by danhak » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 7:02 PM UTC

We coerced young, low-risk people into receiving these treatments despite known side effects on pain of losing their education or employment or being able to enter privately-owned establishments (irrespective of the wishes of the owners of those privately-owned establishments).

We justified it with the specious argument that they were putting other people at undue risk by remaining unvaccinated. We claimed that vaccinated people would not spread the virus.

And we gave the companies producing these vaccines blanket legal immunity from any potential liability.

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#9

Post by whatshisface » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 7:02 PM UTC

canadiantim wrote: post #4

I'm surprised this sort of post is even allowed to be discussed

Myocarditis is rare and has been a part of the discussion from even before the vaccines were released, or at least the professional discussion. They were why the vaccines were not recommended for all ages to begin with.

Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

#10

Post by Mountain_Skies » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 7:03 PM UTC

canadiantim wrote: post #4

I'm surprised this sort of post is even allowed to be discussed

Eventually there aren't enough fingers to plug all the holes in the dike.