The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
1–10 of 108 posts
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#2I was not expecting Matrix and Urbit to be the two technological focuses of this article.
Glad to see Washington DC has think-tanks who are al least literate in fediverse and P2P technology.
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#3> If a user engages in trolling, criminal activity, or abuse, they will be identified and ostracized. Furthermore, they will incur a financial loss, as their reputation will be ruined. Thus content moderation problems are addressed without ill-fitting and abusable corporate or government interventions.
I'm sure that won't go wrong or impact certain groups at all.
There's a lot of content on the internet today that I just don't want to see. Coincidentally, while I had a conversation with people about the benefits of intersectionality a Robin DiAngelo follower joined. This person masked themselves as "just asking questions" and then proceeded to do the oddest form of theatrical racism and subsequent victim position seeking I've ever seen. As much as I'd love to "ostracize" this person and never hear of them again, as much as my day would've been far better without knowing people like this exist, I don't think it's right to ostracize people. That's how we got flat Earth to get so big. We mocked, ostracized, and argued them out of common spaces until they created their own. I'd rather flat Earthers and DiAngelo followers find their way back to rational society, not out from it forever.
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#4> If a user engages in trolling, criminal activity, or abuse, they will be identified and ostracized. Furthermore, they will incur a financial loss, as their reputation will be ruined. Thus content moderation problems are addressed without ill-fitting and abusable corporate or government interventions. I'm sure that won't go wrong or impact certain groups at all. There's a lot of content on the internet today that I…
>proceeded to do the oddest form of theatrical racism and subsequent victim position seeking
I read this and I don't know which side of the spectrum this was about :P
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#5> The courts had traditionally found that liability is determined by whether or not an entity was acting as a publisher actively vetting, producing, and editing content (liable), or a distributor merely selling the products offered by publishers (less-liable).
> The immediate impact of Section 230 was to halt the developing body of common law being forged through internet speech–related litigation.
Big mistake in my opinion.
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#6> If a user engages in trolling, criminal activity, or abuse, they will be identified and ostracized. Furthermore, they will incur a financial loss, as their reputation will be ruined. Thus content moderation problems are addressed without ill-fitting and abusable corporate or government interventions. I'm sure that won't go wrong or impact certain groups at all. There's a lot of content on the internet today that I…
>proceeded to do the oddest form of theatrical racism and subsequent victim position seeking I read this and I don't know which side of the spectrum this was about :P
DiAngelo followers don't generally like intersectionality because their views are incompatible with it.
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#7> If a user engages in trolling, criminal activity, or abuse, they will be identified and ostracized. Furthermore, they will incur a financial loss, as their reputation will be ruined. Thus content moderation problems are addressed without ill-fitting and abusable corporate or government interventions. I'm sure that won't go wrong or impact certain groups at all. There's a lot of content on the internet today that I…
Great Chinese social credit system with ever changing goal lines for punishment
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
>proceeded to do the oddest form of theatrical racism and subsequent victim position seeking I read this and I don't know which side of the spectrum this was about :P
DiAngelo followers don't generally like intersectionality because their views are incompatible with it.
How?
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#9> The courts had traditionally found that liability is determined by whether or not an entity was acting as a publisher actively vetting, producing, and editing content (liable), or a distributor merely selling the products offered by publishers (less-liable). > The immediate impact of Section 230 was to halt the developing body of common law being forged through internet speech–related litigation. Big mistake in my…
No post body was provided.
Re: The decentralized web and the future of Section 230
#10 […] the political establishment’s hostility towards the idea of Twitter being purchased and run by new free speech–friendly management.
Only the „free-speech friendly management“ has been most notable for firing a bunch of people for criticizing him or making fun of his advertisers.