Trolls (2008)
paulgraham.com
Trolls (2008)
1–10 of 321 posts
Re: Trolls (2008)
#2Unfortunately, as the article says, the anonymity of the Internet allows these thoughts to rapidly bubble to the surface, where in most cases there's little repercussions for posting whatever the hell you want. I've encountered very little of this attitude when it comes to meeting people in real life. For most people, it's hard to be a dick in front of a real life person.
Re: Trolls (2008)
#3I for one think on the whole conversation is still good and worthwhile checking out :)
Re: Trolls (2008)
#4Does anyone know what the tipping point for license plates was?
Re: Trolls (2008)
#5http://www.google.com/trends?q=hacker+news%2C+reddit
Edit: That number was from 2008
Re: Trolls (2008)
#6Trolls are important.
Trolling, especially as seen on places like slashdot/4chan/somethingawful/etc., can oftentimes be a mechanism of critique for ideas and rhetorical styles.
One of the best things about the 'net is that, frankly, none of this really matters. None of it. It's a big joke. My twitters and my wikis and my posts don't mean anything. They're bits in the stream. My karma is an int on a server somewhere, incremented and decremented by the whims of my fellow users.
Trolls can help remind all of us that hey, this is all light-hearted. They say outrageous things, they stir up trouble, they cause annoyance, they sully the pristine conditions of these high-minded realms of discourse.
In short, folks, they keep us all honest. They call us on our bullshit. And when a community takes itself so seriously that it becomes a habitat for trolls, it usually is a sign that that community needs to be dispersed, cleaned, and reformed elsewhere.
HN is a pretty cool place, and I hope it lasts a long while before ossifying and becoming infested with trolls.
Re: Trolls (2008)
#7When it comes down to it, many trolls feel the need to bash another language, OS, etc. because it's a form of self-validation: your choice says something about you. You'll see the same kind of thing with the "wars" over PC/Mac, Xbox/PS3, Emacs/vim, etc., even if the person doesn't really understand the differences: picking sides just seems to be natural. Unfortunately, as the article says, the anonymity of the Intern…
We don't need repercussions for posting bad content, as we will evolve powerful judgment to filter it. This is a natural market mechanism I think.
Re: Trolls (2008)
#8That's 8,000 unique visitors per day? Didn't realize HN readership was so small. I catch people in San Francisco scanning new articles, but it must be location bias. http://www.google.com/trends?q=hacker+news%2C+reddit Edit: That number was from 2008
Re: Trolls (2008)
#9Do we have any more recent stats about the viewership of HN now for 2011? How big is it, and more subjectively, how do people feel we are doing with trolls? I for one think on the whole conversation is still good and worthwhile checking out :)
Re: Trolls (2008)
#10Really, in communities I frequent, there are so many trolls, we troll them back. Perhaps we're using the term differently from how pg is?