Live data from Hacker News

Classic 50mm “Normal” Lens

garyvoth.com

1–10 of 167 posts

Re: Classic 50mm “Normal” Lens

#3
I have a highly regarded, but old 50/1.4. I also have a cheaper 50-300/3.5-4.

Big surprise - the 50-300 zoom looks MUCH better than the 50/1.4 at 50 mm. I'm talking about the colors, they are just better and more natural (less aberrations probably). Of course, if you have enough light since it's slower.

I investigated this, and it turns out modern lenses have much better coatings and other optimizations.

Conclusion: lens age matters too, if it's an old design investigate.

Re: Classic 50mm “Normal” Lens

#4
These aren't dead! You can still find a variety of fast 50mm lenses, from a cheap f/1.8 for like $150 (which is still way better than most kit lenses) to a very nice f/1.4 upgrade at like $400 all the way to absurdly expensive ones.

https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/premium-50mm-le...

Their primary advantages:

* Amazing "bokeh" -- the quality and look of the background blur that modern phones mostly try to emulate using computational photography and maybe lidar depth sensing; but the blur effect is simulated in software vs being an actual artifact of the lens construction and aperture

* Incredibly fast, good for dimly-lit conditions or action photography

* Fine-grained control over depth of field makes the subject stand out beautifully

* Teaches you to move your body and camera around to find the perfect framing, instead of standing still in one place and using the zoom. This can often make for more interesting compositions and angles.

* Usually much lighter, especially if you go with an APS-C sized sensor in a mirrorless

Negatives:

* No zoom means you have to be able to get close to the subject. Hard to do with wildlife, some sports, etc.

* One more lens to carry around

--------------

The 50mm is so much fun to shoot. Get one!

Re: Classic 50mm “Normal” Lens

#8
50mm was pretty much the only lens I used for ages when I was shooting film. I had an old Pentax KX SLR (like the K1000 but with a few more bells & whistles), and a regular f/1.7 50mm manual focus lens -- and I loved it. Shot rolls and rolls of film.

I highly recommend shooting old-school like this, as practice. After a while, you stop needing to meter, even, because you understand the light conditions and can pre-emptively configure the camera to do exactly what you want. Then, focus and shoot.

The other thing shooting on film taught me is that one perfect photo is better than 100 bad ones. I find that digital photography natives tend to rely on burst features in an attempt to capture the right moment. But in my experience, especially with portraiture, waiting and then grabbing the precise moment can produce better results.

Re: Classic 50mm “Normal” Lens

#9
post #2

Title should be "The Forgotten Lens" though as a fan of the 50mm just "The" Lens works for me :) The 50mm f/1.8 Z lens for Nikon is really magical, I love any chance to use it.

Same here, have a bunch of lenses, but this one is almost always on the camera. I'm tempted by the 50mm 1.2, but its price gives me pause and I'm worried about its weight.

Re: Classic 50mm “Normal” Lens

#10
post #5

The “nifty fifty” is certainly not forgotten and absolutely a great buy.

It's basically everyone's first lens for the bokeh craze, and then you just keep hunting for even creamier bokeh, until you're broke and wondering where all your money went.
Post reply on HN