The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
newyorker.com
The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
1–10 of 747 posts
Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#2Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#3Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#4Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#5At this point, is the difficulty in amending the Constitution actually a bug? Seeing the polarization, I could see our Founding Fathers deciding that's actually a feature right now because it prevents one side from getting the upper hand and telling the rest to stuff it.
Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#6At this point, is the difficulty in amending the Constitution actually a bug? Seeing the polarization, I could see our Founding Fathers deciding that's actually a feature right now because it prevents one side from getting the upper hand and telling the rest to stuff it.
Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#7At this point, is the difficulty in amending the Constitution actually a bug? Seeing the polarization, I could see our Founding Fathers deciding that's actually a feature right now because it prevents one side from getting the upper hand and telling the rest to stuff it.
Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#8I believe the most likely constitutional change attempts in the short term would be libertarian revisionist windback and amplification of states rights. Reproductive rights would be next but I suspect is less likely to get up because of the impending shift in power balance in government. The revisionist thing, is to me likely because it's like the supreme court stacking and vote shenanigans already seen by the GOP. It's an easy sell to the state governments and wider republican voter.
Re: The United States’ Unamendable Constitution
#9At this point, is the difficulty in amending the Constitution actually a bug? Seeing the polarization, I could see our Founding Fathers deciding that's actually a feature right now because it prevents one side from getting the upper hand and telling the rest to stuff it.
I mostly agree. At this point though, each side tries to circumvent it anyways by at least stretching "interpretations", and the courts tend to allow it.