NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
iapps.courts.state.ny.us
NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
1–10 of 443 posts
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#2Wow, NY finally does something right.
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#3No post body was provided.
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#4[pdf]
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#5Because it's confusing: the NY Supreme Court is just a trial court, it's not at all like the US Supreme Court. The top appellate court is called the Court of Appeals. It's called "supreme" because it has general jurisdiction, as opposed to things like traffic court.
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#6[deleted]
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#7Quoted post unavailable.
Cheers!
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#8No post body was provided.
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#9Quoted post unavailable.
No post body was provided.
Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay
#10Something I've been wondering in recent cases where courts are overturning recent government action, whether unconstitutional bills passed into law, or unconstitutional executive actions that overstep authority, is where's the penalty for committing those actions in the first place?
The state of New York famously responded to the outcome of NYSRPA v. Bruen, which overturned the defacto ban on concealed carry, by declaring nearly all public spaces "sensitive areas" in which licensed individuals may not carry for their protection. Regardless of one's opinion of said rights, how do courts blatantly ignore rulings and orders from higher courts with no repercussions?
How do courts declare certain executive orders unconstitutional, and yet the perpetrators, who took an oath to uphold and defend said rights and values, face no consequences?