Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
1–10 of 126 posts
Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#2"Dr Harpal Kumar, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said leading a healthy lifestyle did not guarantee a person would not get cancer but the study showed 'we can significantly stack the odds in our favour.'"
Many of these lines of evidence where developed originally by looking at environmental differences among different countries, as well as time series in cancer rates as lifestyles changed in countries over time, and comparisons of immigrants of varying ages of arrival (who adopt the lifestyles of new countries either as children or as adults) with relatives who stay in the old country. Then the best-understood models of cancer risk factors are further investigated through controlled experimentation on laboratory animals or on cell lines in vitro. Today it's plain enough that avoiding smoking, eating a varied, balanced diet, and maintaining normal weight through a combination of exercise and moderate eating offers substantial reduction of risk in all-cause mortality, including but not limited to death from cancer.
After edit: the second reply here asked how a diet higher rather than lower in fruits and vegetables can protect from cancers other than colon cancer. According to what I've read about the research, it's thought that some tendencies of healthy body cells to go into uncontrolled growth (cancer) are made worse by lack of micronutrients, which may be lacking in the diets of people who don't eat varied diets. It's also thought that the evolutionary arms race between plants (which tend to evolve tough husks but also phytotoxins as protections against being eaten) and animals (which have to eat some food source ultimately derived from autotrophic organisms, that is mostly plants) results in complex animals being selected for incidental adaptation of phytotoxins to kill off errant cell lines. What's poison in a large does can sometimes be medicine in the therapeutic dose and in the right time and place. All human beings eventually die of something, but the epidemiological evidence (and some laboratory evidence) shows that plant intake reduces chances of dying young of cancer, and these mechanisms are some of those suggested as reasons for that observation.
Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#3I can understand it leading to colon cancer, but does it also lead to other kinds of cancer?
AFAIK even if you never eat fruits/vegetables you aren't lacking any micronutrients?
Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#4Can someone explain how lack of fruit and vegetables leads to cancer? I can understand it leading to colon cancer, but does it also lead to other kinds of cancer? AFAIK even if you never eat fruits/vegetables you aren't lacking any micronutrients?
Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#5Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#6Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#7Can someone explain how lack of fruit and vegetables leads to cancer? I can understand it leading to colon cancer, but does it also lead to other kinds of cancer? AFAIK even if you never eat fruits/vegetables you aren't lacking any micronutrients?
Fruits and vegetables contain antioxidants.
(http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2009/10/02/antioxida...)
Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#8Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#9Apparently eating well, drinking in moderation, not smoking and regular exercise reduce the risk of cancer.
When interviewed, man hiding under rock expressed surprise and gratitude for the update.
Re: Over 40% of cancers due to lifestyle, says review
#10I know this immediately turns on your B.S. sensors, but she changed her lifestyle after spending hours on Pubmed doing research on nutrition's impact on the brain and specifically the mitochondria. I highly recommend the talk, it is both very informative and very moving. And there are some saddening statistics about the lack of vitamins and minerals in the American population.
[1] http://www.sfn.org/am2011/pdf/prelim/SUN_Poster_PM_v2.pdf [2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLjgBLwH3Wc&feature=playe...