27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
1–10 of 45 posts
Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#2Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#3that sounds like very much the way I'd like to go.
Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#4Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#5Quoted post unavailable.
Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#6> The intelligence and casually flamboyant virtuosity with which he framed his often humorous commentaries on human behaviour made his work invariably entertaining and interesting.
> The irreverent eroticism for which his poetry is noted resulted in W. H. Smith's banning of his The Pleasures of the Flesh (1966) from their shops.
Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#7that sounds like very much the way I'd like to go.
Agreed. Dying in your sleep, having been fed a good meal with good company, at a seasoned old age with your wife by your side is as good as anyone can dream of.
Viking warriors and co would probably disagree. Not the gloriest way to Valhalla..
(personally I rather care how good I live, than how I die)
Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#8Quoted post unavailable.
Every internet comment I’ve ever made in anger or snark, I hereby renounce.
Re: 27 years since the Financial Times killed one of England’s finest poets
#9that sounds like very much the way I'd like to go.
For some reason that strikes me as the most moving thing I have read in a long time.