Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
1–10 of 770 posts
Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#2But, I mean, why are they not railing on the phone companies, to make it easy for the homeless to keep the same phone number?!
Why is this Google's fault?
Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#3I disagree with the idea that because a very, very niche audience is in dire straits that the design decisions should be based on their needs. The forced 2FA system has probably prevented identify theft and financial loss for a very large number of people. I'm saying this as someone who thinks Google is a shady and dangerous entity in general.
It's similar to the idea that hard cases make bad law.
Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#4Google has a lot of issues, but the gist of these twitter posts, is that homeless people lose their phones multiple times a year, and their phone number, and this makes 2fa hard. But, I mean, why are they not railing on the phone companies, to make it easy for the homeless to keep the same phone number?! Why is this Google's fault?
Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#5I can definitely understand not realizing that you could lose access to your account if you lose your phone number. But once it happens the first time, could you not pick any free email that does not require 2FA, and warn fellow homeless to avoid gmail? I disagree with the idea that because a very, very niche audience is in dire straits that the design decisions should be based on their needs. The forced 2FA system h…
Not very niche.
Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#6The tough issue here is that these access edge cases look a lot like malicious use. The aren't but authenticating someone who has no device or ID or really much else to authenticate themselves is a Hard Problem. Passwords also aren't the solution here, the industry is moving away from them precisely because they provide poor authentication, particularly for vulnerable people.
Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#7Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#8Also, fully acknowledging Google and other bigtechs 2FA is far from ideal:
The other thing is, we want at the same time Gmail to be unhackable against best hackers and state sponsored adversaries for the billions of users, including high profile dissidents, journalists, and senators who will inevitably have accounts; and at the same time to homeless people who can't keep any physical thing. It's kinda difficult to meet those conflicting requirements well at the same time.
Maybe the solution should be to have some basic free state-paid email provider for those people. They are not forced to use Gmail specifically (albeit the number of non-sucking and free email providers is probably close to zero).
Re: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year
#9Google has a lot of issues, but the gist of these twitter posts, is that homeless people lose their phones multiple times a year, and their phone number, and this makes 2fa hard. But, I mean, why are they not railing on the phone companies, to make it easy for the homeless to keep the same phone number?! Why is this Google's fault?
This is not just the homeless, there was a post on HN from a librarian talking about the same issues for the elderly and socially disadvantaged. The issue is that Google forces 2FA on them, even if they otherwise don’t have a phone.