Live data from Hacker News

Feds seized $311M in Bitcoin, then hacker stole it back

bloomberg.com

1–10 of 229 posts

Re: Feds seized $311M in Bitcoin, then hacker stole it back

#4
It's not immediately clear to me that this is illegal. If anything, the Feds didn't "seize" the Bitcoin, they forcibly acquired a license to the wallet's private key. If they didn't understand that the license was non-exclusive, well, that's not the fault of the other licensees.

Re: Feds seized $311M in Bitcoin, then hacker stole it back

#5

It's not immediately clear to me that this is illegal. If anything, the Feds didn't "seize" the Bitcoin, they forcibly acquired a license to the wallet's private key. If they didn't understand that the license was non-exclusive, well, that's not the fault of the other licensees.

Even funnier, when his brother moved the coins it was a “theft” from the feds? Can you imagine the feds saying we seized an iPhone with a banking app downloaded on it, and then someone else goes to the bank and withdraws the cash and now “stole” it?

Re: Feds seized $311M in Bitcoin, then hacker stole it back

#6

It's not immediately clear to me that this is illegal. If anything, the Feds didn't "seize" the Bitcoin, they forcibly acquired a license to the wallet's private key. If they didn't understand that the license was non-exclusive, well, that's not the fault of the other licensees.

Following this argumentation would imply that cryptocurrencies don't provide a real value and therefore can't be stolen (which also implies that your average cryptocurrency scam is fair game because nothing of value is lost).

A bank account can be seized but that access is not a license. IP is irrelevant here.

Re: Feds seized $311M in Bitcoin, then hacker stole it back

#9

It's not immediately clear to me that this is illegal. If anything, the Feds didn't "seize" the Bitcoin, they forcibly acquired a license to the wallet's private key. If they didn't understand that the license was non-exclusive, well, that's not the fault of the other licensees.

It may not technically be theft, but surely there’s an assortment of crimes committed by doing what he did, including but not limited to fraud, conspiracy, and interference with an investigation.
Post reply on HN