Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
1–10 of 60 posts
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#2Accessible version: https://archive.ph/o7tfG
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#3> Ankhi Das, Facebook’s most senior executive in India, resigned in October 2020 after the Wall Street Journal reported she had intervened to prevent the platform removing accounts of members of the country’s Hindu nationalist ruling party, some of whom had called for violence against India’s Muslim minority.
I am not sure it is Facebook’s place to be policing members of the government of the largest democracy in the world.
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#4> Ankhi Das, Facebook’s most senior executive in India, resigned in October 2020 after the Wall Street Journal reported she had intervened to prevent the platform removing accounts of members of the country’s Hindu nationalist ruling party, some of whom had called for violence against India’s Muslim minority. I am not sure it is Facebook’s place to be policing members of the government of the largest democracy in the…
Facebook claims to follow a content moderation policy [1] for users on its platform. "Members of the government of the largest democracy in the world" is not a justification to bestow some kind of immunity from their policy. They should apply that policy to all users.
[1]: https://transparency.fb.com/en-gb/policies/community-standar...
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#5> Ankhi Das, Facebook’s most senior executive in India, resigned in October 2020 after the Wall Street Journal reported she had intervened to prevent the platform removing accounts of members of the country’s Hindu nationalist ruling party, some of whom had called for violence against India’s Muslim minority. I am not sure it is Facebook’s place to be policing members of the government of the largest democracy in the…
So… you’re in favor of providing a platform to call for violence against ethnic minorities?
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#6> Ankhi Das, Facebook’s most senior executive in India, resigned in October 2020 after the Wall Street Journal reported she had intervened to prevent the platform removing accounts of members of the country’s Hindu nationalist ruling party, some of whom had called for violence against India’s Muslim minority. I am not sure it is Facebook’s place to be policing members of the government of the largest democracy in the…
So… you’re in favor of providing a platform to call for violence against ethnic minorities?
No post body was provided.
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#7> Ankhi Das, Facebook’s most senior executive in India, resigned in October 2020 after the Wall Street Journal reported she had intervened to prevent the platform removing accounts of members of the country’s Hindu nationalist ruling party, some of whom had called for violence against India’s Muslim minority. I am not sure it is Facebook’s place to be policing members of the government of the largest democracy in the…
In what way is that "policing"?
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#8Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> I don't see how Assuming you intend to see, you can see how if you read the article and its linked articles.
I'm only referring to the specific case of the members of the ruling party allegedly making calls for violence. There is nothing in the article that says these were made on Facebook.
Re: Facebook Accused of ‘Whitewashing’ India Human Rights Report
#10> Ankhi Das, Facebook’s most senior executive in India, resigned in October 2020 after the Wall Street Journal reported she had intervened to prevent the platform removing accounts of members of the country’s Hindu nationalist ruling party, some of whom had called for violence against India’s Muslim minority. I am not sure it is Facebook’s place to be policing members of the government of the largest democracy in the…
Facebook claims to follow a content moderation policy [1] for users on its platform. "Members of the government of the largest democracy in the world" is not a justification to bestow some kind of immunity from their policy. They should apply that policy to all users. [1]: https://transparency.fb.com/en-gb/policies/community-standar...
No post body was provided.