Live data from Hacker News

A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

zumsteg.net

1–10 of 346 posts

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#2
The problem with AB testing is that it's a short-term strategy. For example, if a news site runs AB testing with headlines, they'll find that bullshit clickbait headlines get more pageviews than concise, accurate headlines, but the constant use of clickbait headlines will over time destroy overall traffic to your site. More frustratingly, sites run by smart people tend to fall into a balance where the worst articles get the most alluring headlines.

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#4
post #3

AB testing shows zero respect to your customers. It is the equivalent of testing your theories on lab rats. Instead try to improve the customer experience, make better products, improve customer service.

>Instead try to improve the customer experience

AB testing can be (although isn't always) used to improve the customer experience. Assuming you know exactly what will make the customer experience best without actually testing it can also lead to a worse experience.

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#5
post #2

The problem with AB testing is that it's a short-term strategy. For example, if a news site runs AB testing with headlines, they'll find that bullshit clickbait headlines get more pageviews than concise, accurate headlines, but the constant use of clickbait headlines will over time destroy overall traffic to your site. More frustratingly, sites run by smart people tend to fall into a balance where the worst articles…

There’s nothing about AB testing that requires you to use short-term metrics. I used to manage AB tests for online dating sites (OkCupid, Grindr) where subscription revenue is what matters, and the gains of any strategy will take months to materialize. We were well aware that, say, raising prices would yield more short-term revenue at the expense of long-term revenue. That didn’t stop us from testing, it just made the statistics more complicated.

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#6
I'd say this is a sub-category of the saying: "There is nothing in this world that an MBA can't and won't make worse".

It happens when people change perspectives from building and sustaining businesses to exploiting and squeezing every employee, supplier, and customer for the last drop.

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#7
My biggest issue with A/B testing isn't even mentioned here... gaslighting your customers is absolutely not OK. Particularly with older people, the constant "where the f..k did Outlook now put feature XYZ" (in the case that comes to my mind, the CC bar which used to be tab-reachable, now you have to tab+space or manually click on the tiny gray "cc" letters) onslaught is just absurd. When you change how applications behave without telling the users, it's a direct attack on their muscle memory at best and makes them question their sanity at worst.

My second biggest issue is: it's rare that companies offer actual, live-human support these days anyway. When marketing adds A/B testing, shit becomes really annoying if something breaks as a result - usually the phone lines are suddenly flooded, the agents have no idea what has happened either and try to reproduce and figure out what's going on (and sometimes can't because they aren't part of the test group!), and so even people who haven't been in the testing group are going to be very pissed off.

IMHO, A/B testing without explicitly notifying the customers in advance should be banned by law, and that ban be harshly enforced. Customers are not guinea pigs, and with the rise of elderly people on the Internet this becomes an actual public safety issue (as ever-changing stuff makes it easier for scammers!).

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#8
post #4
post #3

AB testing shows zero respect to your customers. It is the equivalent of testing your theories on lab rats. Instead try to improve the customer experience, make better products, improve customer service.

>Instead try to improve the customer experience AB testing can be (although isn't always) used to improve the customer experience. Assuming you know exactly what will make the customer experience best without actually testing it can also lead to a worse experience.

A/B testing helps you maximize a metric, not make customer experience better. Those are different things.

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#9
Intentional or not, one outcome on sites that are relentlessly A/B tested is that the resulting UI design lets users know that content they want is there, they just need to click and scroll a bit more to find it.

Having left FB years ago, I now watch people "navigate" their site/apps with disbelief.

Re: A/B testing gets misused to juice metrics in the short term

#10
post #3

AB testing shows zero respect to your customers. It is the equivalent of testing your theories on lab rats. Instead try to improve the customer experience, make better products, improve customer service.

That's a very weak blanket statement, there are totally reasonable A/B tests you can run that don't deteriorate a user's experience, and the results can guide you to a better customer experience overall.
Post reply on HN