Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
businessweek.com
Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
1–10 of 24 posts
Re: Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
#2That is so awesome. :D
Re: Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
#3The science field doesn't really work like this, does it? You'd think if he definitively proved a particular thing there wouldn't be any animosity about it toward HIM. I can understand being pissed your funding gets cut off and irritated a thing you've been pursuing for years turns out to be a wild goose chase. But are the punitive measures alluded to in that last paragraph normal?
edit: Also wouldn't a "kill switch" be counterproductive with flu and other environmentally persistant diseases? Isn't the point of vaccinations that we train our body to fight the disease? I suppose in emergency situations you'd want to kill the virus outright, but I don't think being able to kill an arbitrary viral outbreak excludes the need for vaccinations and other public health programs.
Re: Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
#4This is a bit of a tangent, but I admire anyone willing to follow through on what the facts tell them rather than switch gears in order to ensure better career mobility.
Re: Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
#5The article mentions the two active "tags" and what they do, but not the context and effect: kill infected cells to stop further infection.
Re: Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
#6Something that is not explicitly stated in the article, other than "virus kills the host cells, anyway", is that the drug works by finding host cells containing viral (specific) RNA, and then killing the host cells (I assume apoptosis means rupturing lysosomes - digestive enzyme packets). The article mentions the two active "tags" and what they do, but not the context and effect: kill infected cells to stop further i…
Re: Computer Scientist Creates Kill-Switch for Biological Viruses
#7> For his PhD thesis, he proved that a working hot fusion reactor would either consume more energy than it generates or spew as much radiation as existing nuclear power plants—a finding that did not endear him to many physicists and cut off some career options. The science field doesn't really work like this, does it? You'd think if he definitively proved a particular thing there wouldn't be any animosity about it to…
To me, that sounds so much like the output of a journalist's nearest-cliche algorithm that it's impossible to say whether there's any truth in it, or how much.