Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
1–10 of 42 posts
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#2For the first time in my life, it seems conceivable that in the next 10-20 years abortion will be fully outlawed in the United States.
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#3For the first time in my life, it seems conceivable that in the next 10-20 years abortion will be fully outlawed in the United States.
No post body was provided.
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#4What's next on the agenda? gay marriage being overturned? interracial marriage?
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#5Now it's down to the individual States. Need an abortion? Drive to California.
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#6Can a lawyer please explain what the word "overturned" means in this context? This wasn't an appeal in Roe v Wade was it? I'm super confused.
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#7What's next on the agenda? gay marriage being overturned? interracial marriage?
likely both. contraceptives next. capitalism and imperialism require a lower caste of workers to turn the gears of the machine--domestic supply of babies needs to be higher for those machines to feast upon.
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#8Now it's down to the individual States. Need an abortion? Drive to California.
Oh you're from Texas? Better pray nobody finds out you went to California for that abortion & reports you to the morality police for the $10,000 bounty
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#9Can a lawyer please explain what the word "overturned" means in this context? This wasn't an appeal in Roe v Wade was it? I'm super confused.
It means superseding law renders Roe v Wade ineffective. (IANAL, etc)
Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
#10What's next on the agenda? gay marriage being overturned? interracial marriage?
Literally yes, by the Court's own admission:
> For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S. ___, ___ (2019) (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated.