The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
warontherocks.com
The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
1–10 of 282 posts
Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#2[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2022/04/01/why-do...
Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#3Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#4Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#5Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#6https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUyAPQEb01Q
Chieftain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI7T650RTT8
Bernard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPth_xqBXGY
Extreme summary, blame me if I missed something obviously important - unsupported tanks will die to infantry or artillery and have done so since shortly after the inception of the tank. Tanks are actually pretty cheap compared to replacing a human, it costs quite a lot to raise a modern human. The tank role still exists, but ratios of tanks to other fighting vehicles may change.
Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#7Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#8Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#9Something I've been thinking about is that with the emergence of weapons like the NLAW and Javelin, the Secret Service probably will have to rethink the security of the US president.
Re: The tank is dead: Long live the javelin, the switchblade, the ... ?
#10now you know why the USMC got rid of all their tanks about 2 years ago.