Live data from Hacker News

Apple Studio Display Contains 64GB of Storage, but Only 2GB Used

macrumors.com

1–10 of 66 posts

Re: Apple Studio Display Contains 64GB of Storage, but Only 2GB Used

#2
If it can run apps, it's probably worth it to have some storage for future use cases. For the reference, 1 hour of 4k video apparently uses ~7GB of space. It doesn't seem unreasonable for a streaming video player to cache the movies you started watching.

Re: Apple Studio Display Contains 64GB of Storage, but Only 2GB Used

#5

So, looks like Apple may be planning to release their own ios powered Smart TV in the future.

I mean… integrating an Apple TV (which is a form of iOS, and runs on phone CPUs already) into the screen seems easy enough at this point.

Re: Apple Studio Display Contains 64GB of Storage, but Only 2GB Used

#8

If it can run apps, it's probably worth it to have some storage for future use cases. For the reference, 1 hour of 4k video apparently uses ~7GB of space. It doesn't seem unreasonable for a streaming video player to cache the movies you started watching.

It can't run apps. Yet anyways. It has an A13 and runs iOS to do camera processing and monitor stuff but there's no app store or Apple TV features. Apple sells Apple TVs with less storage.

Re: Apple Studio Display Contains 64GB of Storage, but Only 2GB Used

#9
If this thing gets a jailbreak, it's poised to be a legendary display. It's essentially really powerful computer embedded into a display.

By processing the stream, many interesting stuff can be done. Maybe it can detect guns, faces or human figures in games and help game players? Maybe it can be used to record, stream or manage the screen?

Of course, I assume it has access to the image delivery. Maybe it cannot access it due to DRM stuff.

Re: Apple Studio Display Contains 64GB of Storage, but Only 2GB Used

#10

So, looks like Apple may be planning to release their own ios powered Smart TV in the future.

I don't think they will. They are in the brain market, not the screen market.

TVs are basically a home appliance. People rarely replace them, and when they do, it's often the cheapest 4K display at their desired size.

Apple is not about any of that. Yes, they could easily build a super premium TV, but what kind of a margin they could squeeze if they make it a top-of-the-line TV with all the features you can imagine? It'd likely be a product with a 5 figure price tag (or $9999, because it's just 4 figures!) with an unacceptably low margin for them.

They have no doubt flirted with that idea, but I can't see how they can execute on it. all TVs basically look the same, because the only 2 things the vast majority of people care about when buying a new TV is 1. price, 2. bezel size.

Post reply on HN