Live data from Hacker News

Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 54 posts

Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#1
Throwaway for obvious reasons.

I’ll try to be as concise as possible. Some details have been changed to protect myself.

I used to operate a website that hotlinked to an asset from $company’s S3 bucket. When $company was made aware of my doing from the FBI, the FBI asked them to calculate the loss amount. They did this by looking at IPs that hit the bucket over a span of 1 month, and the IPs that logged into $company’s service. The number of IPs that they didn’t recognize (about 25,000), multiplied by some multiplier, came out to about $6MM.

The problem: I know how many people I had on my website that hit that asset. It was in the hundreds, not the thousands, definitely not tens of thousands. I know this because my site required a subscription and I know how many subscribers I had. There were (and still are!) hundreds of sites that hotlink to $company’s S3 bucket today, causing them loss, that are free and easily accessible. I can show this.

When I told my lawyer that this couldn’t possibly have been calculated correctly, he said that I’m pretty SOL in arguing this loss amount. He’s not technical so I don’t know if he really understands. Regardless, I’m in the process of discharging him because he’s failed me multiple times in this case so far.

This reeks of all sorts of wrong. $company is an organization known to probably 95% of HNers, they’re a technical organization, and they could not have possibly made the calculation in good faith.

If anyone has any advice, I’d appreciate it. I’ll be checking this thread closely, but I can also be reached by email at hotlinking@protonmail[.]com.

Re: Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#2
First, I understand your technical arguments above (but IANAL.) Find a technical lawyer who understands that your logs and/or subscribers list sets a hard limit to the damage you might have caused. I'm a bit curious about why you're being charged at all if the S3 bucket was publicly available - there are easy ways for the company to secure their bucket if they choose (one example - https://www.msp360.com/resources/blog/how-to-prevent-hotlink...).

You're headline states that you didn't do it but your descriptions admits you did, but maybe not all of it. You need to be completely honest with this. The journalist in Missouri who identified teachers SSNs on the state's web-site was in a similar situation and, while he's ultimately not going to be charged, his legal fees are hefty.

Re: Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#3
post #2

First, I understand your technical arguments above (but IANAL.) Find a technical lawyer who understands that your logs and/or subscribers list sets a hard limit to the damage you might have caused. I'm a bit curious about why you're being charged at all if the S3 bucket was publicly available - there are easy ways for the company to secure their bucket if they choose (one example - https://www.msp360.com/resources/bl…

My understanding is they admitted they did it but not to the extent of loss this company is claiming they did-- thus would legally make the case more severe with sentencing...

Re: Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#4
IANAL but it sounds like the fact that you offered a subscription service for access to $company's asset puts you in more trouble. you may have only gotten x dollars from your subscribers, but it's hard to dispute that you intended to extract y dollars in potential lifetime revenue from those 25k monthly visitors, especially if your revenue growth hasn't been trending negative. it's arguable those free sites didn't cause $company any loss, as those people may not have been interested in the asset had they had to pay for it, but if someone pays you instead of the owner of the IP...

Re: Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#5
Why are you facing any liability whatsoever for linking to public resources?

If the owner of that S3 bucket is facing losses from serving files to the public, why don't they revoke public access? S3 prints big warnings that you are making things public, so it's unreasonable for a company to claim "We didn't mean to make this public"

What was in the bucket? In any case, sounds like you need a better lawyer, I don't see how HN can help you without you going public and telling the whole story.

Re: Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#6
This story doesn’t really make sense. What would you risk by truthfully telling us what company and what kind of assets you’re talking about?

You shouldn’t be having this conversation with the FBI anyway, these details are figured out in courts.

Re: Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#8
IAAL, but am not providing legal advice here.

If this is a criminal case (I assume it is, given the FBI's involvement), the presiding judge has pretty wide discretion to set the terms of the punishment for a conviction, subject to the specific penalties imposed by law and federal sentencing guidelines. Unlike in a civil case, monetary penalties are intended to be punitive, not restorative. The best your attorney can do is make the case as best as they can and plea bargain with the AUSA to get the penalty as low as possible; and failing that, beg the court for mercy, and be thankful if you manage not to go to prison.

You can also plead innocence, go to trial, and hopefully avoid conviction altogether.

(BTW, this post can be admitted into evidence if it comes to the AUSA's attention.)

Re: Help: FBI criminally charged me with $6MM loss for hotlinking. I didn't do it

#9
post #5

Why are you facing any liability whatsoever for linking to public resources? If the owner of that S3 bucket is facing losses from serving files to the public, why don't they revoke public access? S3 prints big warnings that you are making things public, so it's unreasonable for a company to claim "We didn't mean to make this public" What was in the bucket? In any case, sounds like you need a better lawyer, I don't se…

It is no defense to burglary that the homeowner left their front door unlocked.
Post reply on HN