Live data from Hacker News

The software that flies SpaceX rockets and starships

stackoverflow.blog

1–10 of 112 posts

Re: The software that flies SpaceX rockets and starships

#6

Interesting that they are doing updates at only 10 and 50Hz. I had kinda assumed they'd be looking at much higher frequencies for telemetry especially for things like the rocket motor metrics

I thought that too initially, but if you think about the physics it makes sense.. the larger the mass the more stable the object, the lower the frequency of acceleration needed to adjust it's trajectory. Also even though it's dynamic, it's not articulated or anything like dynamic robots.

Take the opposite, a little quad copter, very low mass, will need very high frequencies. I used to manually fly miniature remote control helicopters before all of the automatic control stuff came in, they were extremely, inherently unstable, very tricky to control.

Re: The software that flies SpaceX rockets and starships

#8

If someone from SpaceX is reading (after 5pm, of course), can we get a more nitty-gritty of what's going on software-wise on your end? I'd love to see what control and embedded wizardry you guys are up to.

There is a Reddit AmA by SpaceX software team that has some important details!

Re: The software that flies SpaceX rockets and starships

#9

Interesting that they are doing updates at only 10 and 50Hz. I had kinda assumed they'd be looking at much higher frequencies for telemetry especially for things like the rocket motor metrics

I found this also interesting. I can see how it simplifies the mathematics to use a fixed time interval.

Can anyone experienced comment if 10Hz is very different or the same as vehicle control systems such as a modern car?

Also, are these systems fixed or floating point? Fixed time intervals would help keep numerical instability of floats in check (however I'd really hope this is more formally understood for such a safety-critical system.)

Re: The software that flies SpaceX rockets and starships

#10

  > ...when you plan to reuse booster rockets and shuttles on future missions.
Shuttles? I'm aware of the general term shuttle as a vehicle for going back and forth, but here I'm certain that the better term would be craft, capsule, or Dragon. Certainly not shuttle.
Post reply on HN