Live data from Hacker News

The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

vox.com

1–10 of 22 posts

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#2
>"Nike, for example, gave all office employees a week off earlier this year, and Bumble and LinkedIn enacted similar policies."

This bothers me quite a bit. Only office workers get off? Why not everyone? This seems like some class warfare type bullshit. Everyone is under stress, and the physical laborers may be even worse of simply due to the physical nature of their work

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#3

>"Nike, for example, gave all office employees a week off earlier this year, and Bumble and LinkedIn enacted similar policies." This bothers me quite a bit. Only office workers get off? Why not everyone? This seems like some class warfare type bullshit. Everyone is under stress, and the physical laborers may be even worse of simply due to the physical nature of their work

Fully agreed. I work in such a job (laborer), and the only thing I can figure is that giving office workers extra time off has less of an impact, whereas giving laborers off would affect production/output/service/whatever. We can't have that now, can we? Those companies did not enact this policy without their bottom line as priority, as usual.

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#4

>"Nike, for example, gave all office employees a week off earlier this year, and Bumble and LinkedIn enacted similar policies." This bothers me quite a bit. Only office workers get off? Why not everyone? This seems like some class warfare type bullshit. Everyone is under stress, and the physical laborers may be even worse of simply due to the physical nature of their work

I agree with your points about unfairness, and that laborers are much more deserving of time off than office workers. But I wouldn't characterize it as class warfare.

In most cases, when physical labor doesn't get performed, people notice. There are consequences that ripple out, affecting other people or systems.

In most cases, when office work doesn't get performed, people don't notice. Things just stay the same.

The system rewards cheaper and faster. But that's an issue of (primarily financial) incentives, not sociocultural biases.

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#5
Lol , the world is not ending.

These are the typical exagerations of those who cannot mantain perspective .

These are the same people who scream "We are all gonna die!!!" on a plane during a small turbolence.

I wonder how would the author manage to function had she lived in the 1800s or the 1300s during the great plague.

She'd have offed herself before the plague would have a chance to infect her.

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#6
post #5

Lol , the world is not ending. These are the typical exagerations of those who cannot mantain perspective . These are the same people who scream "We are all gonna die!!!" on a plane during a small turbolence. I wonder how would the author manage to function had she lived in the 1800s or the 1300s during the great plague. She'd have offed herself before the plague would have a chance to infect her.

Indeed, even within the memories of many living people that the author can speak to right now are two events: cold war and Cuban missile crisis where the world really could have ended properly. And the second world war when seventy million humans died and countless others had irreversible damage to them.

This kind of apocalyptic thinking is also damaging to the birth rate "why have children in such a world". The irony here is that is literally how the world can end.

There's also a fallacy of the hinge of history. Everyone thinks they are living in the most important of times ever and they have always done throughout history.

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#7

>"Nike, for example, gave all office employees a week off earlier this year, and Bumble and LinkedIn enacted similar policies." This bothers me quite a bit. Only office workers get off? Why not everyone? This seems like some class warfare type bullshit. Everyone is under stress, and the physical laborers may be even worse of simply due to the physical nature of their work

Fully agreed. I work in such a job (laborer), and the only thing I can figure is that giving office workers extra time off has less of an impact, whereas giving laborers off would affect production/output/service/whatever. We can't have that now, can we? Those companies did not enact this policy without their bottom line as priority, as usual.

Question is why all these office workers have jobs, and why they pay so much.

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#8

>"Nike, for example, gave all office employees a week off earlier this year, and Bumble and LinkedIn enacted similar policies." This bothers me quite a bit. Only office workers get off? Why not everyone? This seems like some class warfare type bullshit. Everyone is under stress, and the physical laborers may be even worse of simply due to the physical nature of their work

Fully agreed. I work in such a job (laborer), and the only thing I can figure is that giving office workers extra time off has less of an impact, whereas giving laborers off would affect production/output/service/whatever. We can't have that now, can we? Those companies did not enact this policy without their bottom line as priority, as usual.

Less of an impact on profits, more impact on workers

Business don't give a shit about workers and this only reinforces that belief. This is a thin facade of caring about workers in that only the ones that don't really matter are treated well. IMO that's what makes this class warfare. It's all the people with cushy high paying jobs that get cares for, and all the others get shat on

Re: The world as we know it is ending. Why are we still at work?

#9
post #4

>"Nike, for example, gave all office employees a week off earlier this year, and Bumble and LinkedIn enacted similar policies." This bothers me quite a bit. Only office workers get off? Why not everyone? This seems like some class warfare type bullshit. Everyone is under stress, and the physical laborers may be even worse of simply due to the physical nature of their work

I agree with your points about unfairness, and that laborers are much more deserving of time off than office workers. But I wouldn't characterize it as class warfare. In most cases, when physical labor doesn't get performed, people notice. There are consequences that ripple out, affecting other people or systems. In most cases, when office work doesn't get performed, people don't notice. Things just stay the same. Th…

Business don't give a shit about workers and this only reinforces that belief. This is a thin facade of caring about workers in that only the ones that don't really matter are treated well. IMO that's what makes this class warfare. It's all the people with cushy high paying jobs that get cares for, and all the others get shat on
Post reply on HN