Web3 is going just great
web3isgoinggreat.com
Web3 is going just great
1–10 of 357 posts
Re: Web3 is going just great
#2Please invest in the Meatverse (http://meatver.se), it's totally not a joke.
Re: Web3 is going just great
#3Please invest in the Meatverse ( http://meatver.se ), it's totally not a joke.
That's the most deliciousverse so far
Re: Web3 is going just great
#4The decision to call all of this "web 3.0" without actually consulting any developers (that don't own/trade cryptocurrencies) was such a mistake.
No - I don't want to write inherently buggy smart contracts for your scam. If I wanted to do that, I would have gone into fintech awhile ago.
Re: Web3 is going just great
#5I'm hearing disturbing reports of all sorts of hacking, thievery, and even trafficking of drugs and people spreading to lawless protocols like DNS, HTTP, TCP. The government must do something to get rid of these dangerous protocols before it's too late.
Re: Web3 is going just great
#6I like how half of these supposed 'bad news' articles are something like "Some Famous Person made an NFT... and people on Twitter are mad about it!"
Re: Web3 is going just great
#7Re: Web3 is going just great
#8Anyone want to do a web2isgoinggreat.com version of this?
Re: Web3 is going just great
#9I'll call Web3 Web3 when I don't need to keep an active whitelist via uMatrix. When I don't need to use uOrigin and when people actually host it on their own infrastructure rather then selling themselves short on the cloud. I will also call it Web3 when it actually brings people together just as Web1 did. And not Web2 where a platform has two social sides shouting at the same bandwagon.
Re: Web3 is going just great
#10The decision to call all of this "web 3.0" without actually consulting any developers (that don't own/trade cryptocurrencies) was such a mistake. No - I don't want to write inherently buggy smart contracts for your scam. If I wanted to do that, I would have gone into fintech awhile ago.
I agree that it's a shame, but looking back at “web 2.0”, wasn't it kind of the same? I'm absolutely guilty about being excited about it at the time, but in retrospect, a bunch of rounded corners and incremental inclusion of Ajax didn't really warrant a SemVer major version update either.
Edit: actually, maybe the justification of the SemVer bump is that people stopped caring about IE5 support :)