Why is Oracle worth $260B?
retool.com
Why is Oracle worth $260B?
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#2Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#3Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#4Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#5I wonder what folks think of OCI? Does it have a chance to compete against AWS and M$ ?
Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#6Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#7I wonder what folks think of OCI? Does it have a chance to compete against AWS and M$ ?
From what I'm told, they've been pushing it very aggressively to existing customers, and growth has been slowing over the past few quarters. Pretty impressive all in all, given they had to start from scratch fairly recently
Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#8Hello everyone, author here. I wrote this post after wondering why Oracle is such a ubiquitous name, but almost no developers I've worked with have ever used it. After some research and conversations with a former employee, it turns out that the story is really interesting: Oracle was basically the first company to commercialize a RDBMS. And today they have what might be the fastest, most performant database at scale…
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multics_Relational_Data_Store
Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#9Re: Why is Oracle worth $260B?
#10Hello everyone, author here. I wrote this post after wondering why Oracle is such a ubiquitous name, but almost no developers I've worked with have ever used it. After some research and conversations with a former employee, it turns out that the story is really interesting: Oracle was basically the first company to commercialize a RDBMS. And today they have what might be the fastest, most performant database at scale…
IBM worked on an RDBMS in 1974, and Honeywell released a commercial RDBMS in 1976* before Oracle launched. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multics_Relational_Data_Store