Live data from Hacker News

Amazon puts its own “brands” first above better-rated products

themarkup.org

1–10 of 51 posts

Re: Amazon puts its own “brands” first above better-rated products

#2
Maybe it's because Amazon's site is just trash, but it's the trash we've become accustomed to. When you search for a very specific product and then choose sort by price and all if a sudden hundreds of irrelevant cheap items are at the top of the list. That's total trash design from a user perspective.

From a corporate perspective it's a great design because they have such a large market share. Now they just have all other sorting methods broken/useless except their default. Their default sort they can say "algorithms" while waving their hands, and we all just go, ok sounds good and we keep buying. Because as a consumer it's good enough for us.

People used to complain about Walmarts requirements for selling in there stores. Amazon is just as bad.

Re: Amazon puts its own “brands” first above better-rated products

#3
I don't trust Amazon ratings even a little bit. But I do expect anything Amazon branded to at least not be complete garbage. Maybe this is Amazon just embracing the fact no one can trust their ratings, but can somewhat trust their product partnerships?

Re: Amazon puts its own “brands” first above better-rated products

#10
I completely stopped using Amazon about 8 months ago and I found I just end up spending less money overall. I skip impulse buying lots of junk I might have bought with a prime subscription and on many items I have ended up buying the cost of a local store is similar or better.

The best days of Amazon are behind it.

Post reply on HN