FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
spectrum.ieee.org
FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
1–10 of 134 posts
Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#2Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#3What kind of deranged person messes with GPS risking to crash an airplane?
Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#4What kind of deranged person messes with GPS risking to crash an airplane?
Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#5What kind of deranged person messes with GPS risking to crash an airplane?
This requirement should be reasonable to most people who aren’t pacifists. So I think the real question is, why aren’t senior level DoD and FAA bosses doing more to increase safety during the planned outages?
Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#6Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#7What kind of deranged person messes with GPS risking to crash an airplane?
But seriously "We've been told we can't ask to stop jamming, and to just put everyone on headings."... people inbound not ready for this can run out of fuel. Maybe the right passive aggressive response could have been to simply set a really large diameter TFR to keep civilian aircraft away assuming people check NOTAMs.
Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#8Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#9What kind of deranged person messes with GPS risking to crash an airplane?
The DoD wants to ensure their forces can operate if GPS is down. This requirement should be reasonable to most people who aren’t pacifists. So I think the real question is, why aren’t senior level DoD and FAA bosses doing more to increase safety during the planned outages?
OTOH, would it be possible to have other location services such as Galileo, GLONASS, and BeiDou available as backups (or letting they all vote on your position)?
Re: FAA Fumbled Its Response to a Surge in GPS Jamming
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US military, per the article.
Makes sense. They don't seem to select for social responsibility.
The issue according to the article is with the FAA, not the military