I'm sorry

I'm confused why the correct course of action isn't to revert the commit, ask the author to re-open the PR for comment, and follow the process. Why the tortious apology?

Re: I'm sorry

#6

Post by umeshunni » Wed, Oct 06, 2021, 11:06 PM UTC

Afforess wrote: post #5

I'm confused why the correct course of action isn't to revert the commit, ask the author to re-open the PR for comment, and follow the process. Why the tortious apology?

Because attention seeking...

Re: I'm sorry

#7

Post by [deleted] » Wed, Oct 06, 2021, 11:07 PM UTC

herpderperator wrote: post #2

Anyone have a link to the PR in question?

[deleted]

Re: I'm sorry

#8

Post by Afforess » Wed, Oct 06, 2021, 11:07 PM UTC

umeshunni wrote: post #6

Afforess wrote: post #5

I'm confused why the correct course of action isn't to revert the commit, ask the author to re-open the PR for comment, and follow the process. Why the tortious apology?

Because attention seeking...

I'm trying to assume good faith

Re: I'm sorry

#9

Post by [deleted] » Wed, Oct 06, 2021, 11:08 PM UTC

[deleted]

Re: I'm sorry

#10

Post by pwdisswordfish0 » Wed, Oct 06, 2021, 11:09 PM UTC

holy fuck, does every little mistake need a solemn 4000 word apology these days? that’s already not a world i want to live in, but then even the apology gets shit on and invalidated. people need to take everything much less seriously, especially shit that happens on the internet.

this whole thing should have been able to be a new PR with “sorry about the merge before, i screwed up and it won’t happen again” at the end, and everyone should have been fine with it and moved on.