Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
1–10 of 264 posts
Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#2Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#3They are the little brothers reporting your 'thinking' to big brother to see if they will ban you or not.
Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#4There was another submission a few minutes ago in the same light. It linked to an article about how Big Tech companies are censoring doctors and decide what is accurate medical information. It was removed.
Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#5Where is the line drawn, and what responsibility does each level have?
Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#6I'd like to be able to export data easily, run my own programs easily, write software that doesn't get taxed or asked to be resubmitted (since when did Microsoft charge for Windows app development?)
Every company purports to be for you, but it's a big toothy grinned lie. Some of them sell you, others sell you out.
It also sucks that these companies surface the worst of humanity to drive engagement. Are people really this terrible?
Tech started to sour in 2005.
Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#7Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#8https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/setting-the-record-straigh...
Edit: keep bringing those freethinker(tm) downvotes. It won't change the law one bit, but I guess it gives good feels.
I mean you could also try starting your own social media network that absolutely guarantees first amendment rights, but so far only hilarity has ensued from that premise along the lines of tragedy plus time equals comedy. You could be the first one to prove them all wrong. What's stopping you?
Or if that's too hard, why don't you all apply to work at Facebook and Twitter? Then you can work your way up the ladder until you can depose Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg. And on the first day of your reign of your new empire you can proclaim to all shareholders and employees that your social media site is entirely unregulated. Otherwise WTH should these companies care about you? You won't build anything and you won't do the work to change the path of something already built.
Re: Big Tech are supposed to be the plumbers, not patricians of internet discourse
#9This is rehashing the old "common carrier" debate again, isn't it? Which of these are the common carriers: Physical wire/connectivity provider? ISP? Tier1 ISPs? Social media sites connecting messages with other folks? Where is the line drawn, and what responsibility does each level have?