unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
#2No other re-ligion (= back-binding [one etymological analysis] to some ideas to rely on for humans) is necessary for a society, but only reasoned about principles: reflection, symmetry, cooperative construction (by too many CAs -> 1CA).
Evolved religions like Christianity also abide to following principles. Their followers do reflect about the world, they are in search of beauty (symmetry), they try to establish one text as core of their religion. Uncovering an abstract core of every human society is our goal here for the betterment of education and world management. (Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions. )
[edit] top link was wrong, so excuse this post again!
Re: unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
#3tl;dr People on ‘ludes should not drive.
Re: unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
#4tl;dr People on ‘ludes should not drive.
What do you think the "United Nations" should do actually? Is the world so well?
Re: unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
#5Re: unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you think the "United Nations" should do actually? Is the world so well?
Ban all religions except for lambda calculus. The first goal must be to make every human being a rational actor all the time. We start by watching Star Trek .
"Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions."
Respect means, everyone should be able to practice his or her religious beliefs. There is no banning intended. Rather some abstract layer is proposed here, every regular religion could connect to. Having any religious believer plus even atheists in one boat, might be some advantage.
Re: unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ban all religions except for lambda calculus. The first goal must be to make every human being a rational actor all the time. We start by watching Star Trek .
"Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions." Respect means, everyone should be able to practice his or her religious beliefs. There is no banning intended. Rather some abstract layer is proposed here, every regular religion could conn…
What language and framework will you use? I’m thinking node so people could install a module for their religion from npm and then update automatically. That would handle dependencies too, like Christian depends on Bible, etc. Atheist is a placeholder module with no dependencies.
Re: unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions." Respect means, everyone should be able to practice his or her religious beliefs. There is no banning intended. Rather some abstract layer is proposed here, every regular religion could conn…
What language and framework will you use? I’m thinking node so people could install a module for their religion from npm and then update automatically. That would handle dependencies too, like Christian depends on Bible, etc. Atheist is a placeholder module with no dependencies.
Could you try to be less sarcastic? How else to start thinking about a possible unity? And, I'm talking about a unity of science and humanity. (Please, have a look at the page again, I added some examples!) That reflection is an important phaenomenon as proven in physics by double-slit-experiment, ok what could that mean for science if reflection can be seen as our mind's thinking, too? (humanities vs. nat. science)
That one data store (this "book") is useful for making complex applications work ... many examples of this in programming: facebook's react/redux immutable data flow.
I am really asking about the logical beginning of perfect education/management of the world. No more superstition, and other errors...