AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
spectrum.ieee.org
AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
1–10 of 42 posts
Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#2Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#3Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#4Some interesting ideas, but it’s all conjecture and very little data. I’m sure Dr Kim knows this stuff inside out, but I felt like the content lacked support. Also, there are somewhat contradictory statements. Eg. The point about evolution being equivalent to millions of years of AI training is absurd - In a later sentence, the author states that computers were designed for computation (duh) and so it shouldn’t be a…
I remember Microsoft introducing an early AI in a game and they made it a young boy. This seemed like an artful/deceptive attempt to take advantage of human biases to make it seem more inpressive than it was.
Which is fine, up to a point, for showbiz, but probably not ideal for wider applications.
I'm not sure if this technique has a name but I see it more and more like " has more than ". They're not lying but they are taking advantage of human biases to very specifically talk about a minor truth to distract you from the overall truth.
"Rinsing your recycling (in water heated by electricity generated by coal) generates more carbon than the recycling saves". Again true, but carefully crafted to make you think the opposite of the truth.
Notably, no evil, mustache-twirling villain is required for this. The people who make boring, reasonable assertions will be automatically filtered out in favour of the people making wild and sloppy claims that appeal to people's biases and when they get caught out they'll be replaced by another similar person.
But a few villains will intentionally take advantage of it too.
Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#5Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#6Some interesting ideas, but it’s all conjecture and very little data. I’m sure Dr Kim knows this stuff inside out, but I felt like the content lacked support. Also, there are somewhat contradictory statements. Eg. The point about evolution being equivalent to millions of years of AI training is absurd - In a later sentence, the author states that computers were designed for computation (duh) and so it shouldn’t be a…
Journalism tends to reward this. I used to work in a much more public-facing field where we would regularly get calls from local journalists about projects we were involved in.
The journalists never printed the quotes from the engineers who gave thoughtful, measured, and accurate answers. They always quoted the blowhards and the charlatans in our office who'd inevitably toss together a bunch of meaningless buzzwords, make a series of vague statements that sounded insightful, and play fast and loose with the facts. A journalist's job is to sell newspapers, or clicks, not to keep anyone informed.
Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#7Some interesting ideas, but it’s all conjecture and very little data. I’m sure Dr Kim knows this stuff inside out, but I felt like the content lacked support. Also, there are somewhat contradictory statements. Eg. The point about evolution being equivalent to millions of years of AI training is absurd - In a later sentence, the author states that computers were designed for computation (duh) and so it shouldn’t be a…
I thought it made a good point. I remember Microsoft introducing an early AI in a game and they made it a young boy. This seemed like an artful/deceptive attempt to take advantage of human biases to make it seem more inpressive than it was. Which is fine, up to a point, for showbiz, but probably not ideal for wider applications. I'm not sure if this technique has a name but I see it more and more like " has more than…
Let’s say that I read "Rinsing your recycling (in water heated by electricity generated by coal) generates more carbon than the recycling saves", investigate it, and convlude it’s true.
What is the additional truth that statement is making me think the opposite of? I lost you there.
Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
I thought it made a good point. I remember Microsoft introducing an early AI in a game and they made it a young boy. This seemed like an artful/deceptive attempt to take advantage of human biases to make it seem more inpressive than it was. Which is fine, up to a point, for showbiz, but probably not ideal for wider applications. I'm not sure if this technique has a name but I see it more and more like " has more than…
I think your given example could benefit from spelling it out further. Let’s say that I read "Rinsing your recycling (in water heated by electricity generated by coal) generates more carbon than the recycling saves", investigate it, and convlude it’s true. What is the additional truth that statement is making me think the opposite of? I lost you there.
edit: I removed a "not" to clear up the ambiguous double-negative. Summary, my position is that science says recycling is a good thing. Numerous media stories will focus relentlessly on any small flaw in it, either to get a reaction from the people who do it and think it's a good thing, or support the people who fight against it for political reasons as it represents (like global warming) a massive failure of free markets.
Re: AI and Robots Are a Minefield of Cognitive Biases
#9Brains are survival engines, not truth detectors. If self deception promotes fitness, the brain lies. Stops noticing irrelevant things. Truth never matters. Only fitness. By now you don’t experience the world as it exists at all. - Peter Watts "Blindsight"