Zero Knowledge

#1

Post by packym » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 10:07 PM UTC

Zero Knowledge
notboring.co

Re: Zero Knowledge

#2

Post by am33 » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 10:29 PM UTC

wow surprised your submissions here werent beloved

Re: Zero Knowledge

#3

Post by girriPal » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 10:49 PM UTC

This was a great read. What are some other interesting links on Zero Knowledge?

Re: Zero Knowledge

#4

Post by atweiden » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 10:50 PM UTC

In the context of blockchain scalability, IIUC off-chain verifiers only periodically settle on-chain. How much damage can a malicious verifier do?

Re: Zero Knowledge

#5

Post by girriPal » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 10:50 PM UTC

For those more technically inclined: Zero Knowledge Proof (with Avi Wigderson) - Numberphile https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ovdoxnfFVc

Re: Zero Knowledge

#6

Post by platz » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 10:58 PM UTC

> In the real-world, we obviously wouldn’t be able to manually mark the papers, they would automatically be marked based on actual data

marked automatically by who, and why is outsourcing the information to an 'automatic' third-party a "proof"? Why should that third-party be trusted?

Re: Zero Knowledge

#7

Post by altdataseller » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 11:03 PM UTC

Packy is gaming Hacker news. Telling his friends to upvote this. He’s a sly marketer.

Re: Zero Knowledge

#8

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 11:08 PM UTC

[deleted]

Re: Zero Knowledge

#9

Post by hanniabu » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 11:09 PM UTC

Thank you blockchain for funding its advancement

Re: Zero Knowledge

#10

Post by hanniabu » Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 11:13 PM UTC

atweiden wrote: post #4

In the context of blockchain scalability, IIUC off-chain verifiers only periodically settle on-chain. How much damage can a malicious verifier do?

That depends on the implementation, some verify and settle every block.