Why does Google show that 2^1000 = 1.07150861 × 10^301?
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Why does Google show that 2^1000 = 1.07150861 × 10^301?
#2However, you could easily compute this yourself...
>>> 2**1000
1071508607186267320948425049060001810561404811705533607443750
3883703510511249361224931983788156958581275946729175531468251
8714528569231404359845775746985748039345677748242309854210746
0506237114187795418215304647498358194126739876755916554394607
7062914571196477686542167660429831652624386837205668069376LRe: Why does Google show that 2^1000 = 1.07150861 × 10^301?
#3That looks correct to me, to the given number of significant figures. Did you expect to get all 301 digits? I don't think Google Search provides that kind of precision ;p However, you could easily compute this yourself... >>> 2**1000 1071508607186267320948425049060001810561404811705533607443750 3883703510511249361224931983788156958581275946729175531468251 8714528569231404359845775746985748039345677748242309854210746…
>>> 2**1000Re: Why does Google show that 2^1000 = 1.07150861 × 10^301?
#4That looks correct to me, to the given number of significant figures. Did you expect to get all 301 digits? I don't think Google Search provides that kind of precision ;p However, you could easily compute this yourself... >>> 2**1000 1071508607186267320948425049060001810561404811705533607443750 3883703510511249361224931983788156958581275946729175531468251 8714528569231404359845775746985748039345677748242309854210746…
Re: Why does Google show that 2^1000 = 1.07150861 × 10^301?
#5That looks correct to me, to the given number of significant figures. Did you expect to get all 301 digits? I don't think Google Search provides that kind of precision ;p However, you could easily compute this yourself... >>> 2**1000 1071508607186267320948425049060001810561404811705533607443750 3883703510511249361224931983788156958581275946729175531468251 8714528569231404359845775746985748039345677748242309854210746…
That is, >>> 2**1000
Re: Why does Google show that 2^1000 = 1.07150861 × 10^301?
#6That looks correct to me, to the given number of significant figures. Did you expect to get all 301 digits? I don't think Google Search provides that kind of precision ;p However, you could easily compute this yourself... >>> 2**1000 1071508607186267320948425049060001810561404811705533607443750 3883703510511249361224931983788156958581275946729175531468251 8714528569231404359845775746985748039345677748242309854210746…