What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
1–10 of 87 posts
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#2This seems like an act of penance by The Guardian.
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#3No mention of your support for the invasion of Iraq then?
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#4Can we have all newspapers do this?
I imagine few would be as honest as this
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#5Can we have all newspapers do this? I imagine few would be as honest as this
Even this seems pretty dishonest, when all the entries are from before the time when many of the Guardian's current staff were not alive.
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#6By The Guardian.
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#7No mention of your support for the invasion of Iraq then?
Iraq: the case for decisive action. Published 18th Jan 2003. (https://www.theguardian.com/news/2003/jan/19/leaders.politic...).
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#8No mention of your support for the invasion of Iraq then?
Too recent, easier to bash dead people than people who may still work for them.
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#9Can we have all newspapers do this? I imagine few would be as honest as this
The KC Star apologized for its past racist coverage last year: https://www.npr.org/2020/12/22/949271163/the-kc-star-apologi...
Re: What we got wrong: the Guardian’s worst errors of judgment over 200 years
#10No mention of your support for the invasion of Iraq then?
[deleted]