Live data from Hacker News

1700 Cascadia Earthquake

en.wikipedia.org

1–10 of 118 posts

Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake

#6

"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast." Ouch.

It's a great soundbite, but it loses a lot of context when distilled down.

Most of the infill west of I5 in the Seattle area will probably liquefy, but there's mountain ranges to the west of I5 that would take a hell of a quake to toast.

Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake

#7
post #4
post #2

Would not be complete without this fantastic article: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big...

And Peter Watts' Starfish, from the web site of the author https://www.rifters.com/real/STARFISH.htm That's the next earthquake.

And Pacific Northwest Seismic Network blog

https://pnsn.org/blog/2020/01/27/getting-ready-for-the-next-...

Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake

#8

"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast." Ouch.

It's a great soundbite, but it loses a lot of context when distilled down. Most of the infill west of I5 in the Seattle area will probably liquefy, but there's mountain ranges to the west of I5 that would take a hell of a quake to toast.

Yes, I have assumed they meant something more specific, like "every building and road west of I5" (I live only a few miles east, so I doubt I'd be unscathed myself, somehow).

Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake

#9

"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast." Ouch.

It's a great soundbite, but it loses a lot of context when distilled down. Most of the infill west of I5 in the Seattle area will probably liquefy, but there's mountain ranges to the west of I5 that would take a hell of a quake to toast.

The earth will be fine its the humans we are worried about

Specifically, the perpetual habitability for humans

Post reply on HN