Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
1–10 of 47 posts
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#2They'll have to start with CNN, NBC, MSNBC, NY Times and their ilk for the countless times they repeated the Russia hoax, the Covington boys hoax, the Bubba Smollett hoax, the Jussie Wallace hoax, just to name a few.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#3lol - "repeat misinformers"
Ministry of Truth indeed. Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not as a flipping implementation guide.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#4And who determines what is “misinformation”?
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#5The problem with articles like this (and advocacy groups like Avaaz) is that their definition of "hateful" and "inaccurate" content casts a rather large net of which their definition is rather nebulous.
Their claims are dubious at best.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#6Thanks but I’d rather decide what’s misinformation for myself.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#7And who determines what is “misinformation”?
Who will guard the guards?
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#8The problem with articles like this (and advocacy groups like Avaaz) is that their definition of "hateful" and "inaccurate" content casts a rather large net of which their definition is rather nebulous. Their claims are dubious at best.
From reading the article, I'm reasonably certain that Avaaz is using Facebook's own definitions.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#9I’m not spending time reading a salon article, but I’m willing to bet money that their definition of “repeat misinformer” is total bullshit.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#10just freaking leave facebook already, you don't need it