Live data from Hacker News

Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

pastebin.com

1–10 of 43 posts

Re: Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

#2
The short and sweet:

Lulzsec is encouraging everyone to deface government websites with #AntiSec as well as in physical graffiti.

'Top priority is to steal and leak any classified government information, including email spools and documentation. Prime targets are banks and other high-ranking establishments'.

Claims to have Anonymous on board.

Does anyone else smell a less free Internet approaching closer?

Re: Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

#4
post #3

They don't really explain why we should be placing #AntiSec everywhere. This document seems like a rabble rousing speech without any substance at all.

I'm guessing it is just an awareness ploy. If the news picks it up, it gives all the stories something in common to mention. Likewise with any defacement that happens, if someone sees a common word, they are more likely to search for it and hence find more.

Where or not it works for them or turns in to a bit of an embarrassment for them, is yet to be seen.

I'll keep an eye on google trends to see how it pans out: http://www.google.com/trends?q=antisec%2Clulzsec&ctab=0&...

Re: Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

#5
Horey shiit, it's antisec tiem[1] kiddies! And it looks like I was right[2] about there being a strong correlation between Lulzsec gentlemen and AnonOps. This should be fun.

Btw, what's it gonna take to raise zerofor0wned from slumber again? They haven't published in awhile and I miss them. Surely Lulzsec kids are of the age of majority now, let's get the soft gloves off and do some real doxing.

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisec_Movement

[2]: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2631053

Re: Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

#6
post #3

They don't really explain why we should be placing #AntiSec everywhere. This document seems like a rabble rousing speech without any substance at all.

I'm guessing it is just an awareness ploy. If the news picks it up, it gives all the stories something in common to mention. Likewise with any defacement that happens, if someone sees a common word, they are more likely to search for it and hence find more. Where or not it works for them or turns in to a bit of an embarrassment for them, is yet to be seen. I'll keep an eye on google trends to see how it pans out: htt…

Lol, defacements happen everyday brah: http://zone-h.org/archive

And antisec, no-disclosure fundies have been around for a lot longer then Lulzsec.

Re: Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

#7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing it is just an awareness ploy. If the news picks it up, it gives all the stories something in common to mention. Likewise with any defacement that happens, if someone sees a common word, they are more likely to search for it and hence find more. Where or not it works for them or turns in to a bit of an embarrassment for them, is yet to be seen. I'll keep an eye on google trends to see how it pans out: htt…

Lol, defacements happen everyday brah: http://zone-h.org/archive And antisec, no-disclosure fundies have been around for a lot longer then Lulzsec.

No argument there. I'm unsure what your point is though?

Re: Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

#8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lol, defacements happen everyday brah: http://zone-h.org/archive And antisec, no-disclosure fundies have been around for a lot longer then Lulzsec.

No argument there. I'm unsure what your point is though?

It just seemed from your comment that you were implying any defacements in the near future from here on out should be attributed to Lulzsec fools. Which is nonsense.

Re: Lulzsec Declares 'Operation Anti-Security'

#9
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No argument there. I'm unsure what your point is though?

It just seemed from your comment that you were implying any defacements in the near future from here on out should be attributed to Lulzsec fools. Which is nonsense.

I fear you have read words that don't exist.
Post reply on HN